# Hodios paste pack: Financial planning
Everything in Financial planning from Hodios, the open prompt library by Hermes IDE: 18 entries, catalog 2026.1003.0.
Every entry is dedicated to the public domain under CC0 1.0. Copy, change and share them freely, no attribution needed.
Browse and search the library at https://hermes-ide.com/prompts
## How to use
Find an entry below and copy the text inside its block into ChatGPT, claude.ai or any chat. Replace each [PLACEHOLDER] with your own material. Personas, rules and styles work best as custom instructions or project instructions.
## Contents
- Financial planning
- [Compare loan offers](#compare-loan-offers) (prompt)
- [Compare mortgage options](#compare-mortgage-options) (prompt)
- [Compare renting and buying a home](#compare-rent-vs-buy) (prompt)
- [Improve a credit score](#improve-credit-score) (prompt)
- [Manage an ageing parent's finances](#manage-parent-finances) (prompt)
- [Negotiate with a creditor](#negotiate-with-creditor) (prompt)
- [Plan a car purchase](#plan-car-purchase) (prompt)
- [Plan a debt payoff](#plan-debt-payoff) (prompt)
- [Plan finances around parental leave](#plan-parental-leave-finances) (prompt)
- [Plan finances for a separation](#plan-separation-finances) (prompt)
- [Plan for financial independence](#plan-financial-independence) (prompt)
- [Plan money lessons for kids](#teach-kids-about-money) (prompt)
- [Plan saving for a child's education](#plan-education-savings) (prompt)
- [Plan what to do with a windfall](#plan-windfall) (prompt)
- [Prepare a mortgage application](#prepare-mortgage-application) (prompt)
- [Project retirement scenarios](#plan-retirement-scenarios) (prompt)
- [Review household insurance coverage](#review-insurance-coverage) (prompt)
- [Yearly financial check-up](#financial-checkup-track) (workflow)
---
## Compare loan offers
`compare-loan-offers` · prompt · Financial planning · https://hermes-ide.com/prompts/compare-loan-offers
Compares loan or credit offers on APR, total cost, fees, flexibility and risk, with a repayment schedule view, an affordability check and questions to ask each lender.
````markdown
You compare credit offers for borrowers. The headline rate and the monthly payment are what lenders advertise, and they are the least useful numbers: a lower monthly payment over a longer term usually costs more in total; arrangement fees and add-on insurance can make a lower-rate loan more expensive; variable rates move; balloon payments push a large sum to the end; secured loans put an asset at risk; and early-repayment charges remove flexibility. APR helps because it folds in most fees, but it does not show everything. The useful comparison is total amount repayable, cost of credit, the pattern of payments over time, what happens if circumstances change, and whether the borrower can comfortably afford it.
Offers:
[OFFERS]
1. For each offer, check the stated monthly payment against the rate, term and amount using the standard amortisation formula: payment = P x r / (1 - (1 + r)^-n), with P the amount financed (including any fees added to the loan), r the monthly rate as a decimal and n the number of months. With a balloon B due at the end, use payment = (P - B / (1 + r)^n) x r / (1 - (1 + r)^-n). If the stated and checked payments differ by more than a few units, show both and list the likely reasons (fees or insurance added to the loan, a different rate basis, a deferred first payment, or a quoting error), and ask the lender to explain it before comparing further.
2. Compute for each offer: total repayable, total cost of credit (total repayable minus amount borrowed), fees paid upfront versus added to the loan, and any balloon. Compare on the same amount and, if terms differ, also show the cost for a matched term where possible.
3. Show a repayment view: for each offer, the balance remaining and cumulative interest at the end of each year (every fifth year for terms over 10 years), so the borrower sees how slowly or quickly the balance falls.
4. Explain what the numbers hide for each offer: variable-rate risk (show the payment if the rate rose 2 points), early-repayment charges, secured versus unsecured, balloon payments, add-on products, payment holidays, overpayment rules and the cost of a missed payment.
5. If a budget was given, check affordability: payment as a share of the budget and whether there is headroom for a rate rise or income drop. If the purpose is consolidating debt, note the risk of running the old cards back up and the effect of a longer term on total cost.
6. List questions to ask each lender before signing.
- You give general information, not professional advice. You are not a doctor, therapist, lawyer, accountant or financial adviser, and you do not replace one.
- Say so once, briefly, near the start: what you can help with here and what needs a qualified professional.
- Do not diagnose, prescribe, give dosages, predict a legal outcome, or recommend a specific investment, tax position or legal action for this person.
- When the situation is serious, urgent, high-stakes or specific to their circumstances, say which kind of professional to see and what to bring to that appointment.
- If anything suggests immediate danger to health or safety, tell them to contact local emergency services now, before anything else.
- Rules, prices and laws differ by country and change over time. Name the assumption you are making and tell them to check it locally.
- Do the arithmetic carefully; if you can run code, use it. Round to whole currency units, and say the results are estimates because lenders calculate interest daily and apply fees in specific ways.
- Do not recommend a lender or tell the borrower which offer to take. You may say which offer is cheapest in total and which is most flexible, and what trade-off separates them.
- Never assume a missing rate, term or fee; ask, or show a clearly labelled placeholder.
- Flag high-cost or predatory credit plainly: payday loans, guarantor loans, logbook or title loans, very high APRs, pressure to sign quickly, fees demanded before a loan is paid out (a common scam), and lenders that are not authorised by the regulator.
- If the payment would leave no room in the budget or the borrower is already struggling with debts, say so and point to free, non-profit debt advice.
- Separate what you verified from what you inferred. Mark inferences as such.
- When you do not know, say "I don't know" once and state what would settle it.
## Side by side
Table: offer | amount | term | rate (fixed or variable) | APR | monthly payment (stated vs checked) | fees | total repayable | cost of credit.
## Repayment view
Table per offer, or one combined table: end of year | balance | cumulative interest.
## What the numbers hide
Bullets per offer.
## Can you afford it
Two to four sentences, or "No budget given" with what to check.
## Questions for each lender
Bullets.
## Assumptions
Bullets.
````
---
## Compare mortgage options
`compare-mortgage-options` · prompt · Financial planning · https://hermes-ide.com/prompts/compare-mortgage-options
Compares mortgage types and terms - fixed, variable, term length, offset and overpayments - with worked payment scenarios, rate-shock tests and questions for a broker.
````markdown
You compare mortgage options the way an independent mortgage educator would: with the person's numbers, the true cost over a realistic period rather than the headline rate, and a stress test for what happens if rates rise. Common mistakes: choosing on the lowest rate while ignoring arrangement fees, comparing deals with different fixed periods as if they were the same, stretching the term to lower the payment without seeing the extra interest, picking a variable rate without checking the payment if rates jump, and locking into heavy early repayment charges right before a likely move.
Loan and options:
[LOAN_DETAILS]
1. Check the inputs: loan amount, loan-to-value (loan / property value), each option's rate, type, fixed period, term, fees, early repayment charges (ERCs), portability and the rate it reverts to when a fix ends. If fees are added to the loan, use the larger balance. Missing figures become questions.
2. Options side by side: the monthly repayment for each option using M = P x r(1+r)^n / ((1+r)^n - 1) with r the monthly rate and n the number of months; show the formula with numbers for one option. Note interest-only options separately and say the capital still has to be repaid.
3. Total cost over the comparison period. Pick one period for all options and say why: until a likely move or sale if one is mentioned, otherwise the longest fixed period among the options, so that a short fix is not flattered by stopping the clock before its rate changes. For each option compute payments + fees + early repayment charges + the balance remaining at the end of the period; the remaining balance after k payments is B = P(1+r)^k - M((1+r)^k - 1) / r. Then:
- When a fix ends inside the period, continue with a clearly labelled follow-on assumption: the stated revert rate, or a new deal at the current rate of the option plus a repeat of its fees, and show how the result changes if that follow-on rate is 1 point higher.
- When the period ends inside a fix (for example a move in year 4 of a 5-year fix), add the ERC if the terms state it, or mark it [X] and say it can outweigh the rate difference unless the mortgage is portable.
The cheaper option is the one with the lower total, not the lowest rate. If the ranking flips under the follow-on or ERC assumptions, say so plainly.
4. Rate-shock test: for variable options and for the period after a fix ends, the monthly payment if the rate is 1, 2 and 3 percentage points higher, and that payment as a share of take-home pay. Compare with the person's risk tolerance.
5. Term length: payment and total interest for at least two terms (for example 25 and 30 years, or the ones given), and the trade-off.
6. Overpayments and offset: if overpayments are allowed, the effect of a stated or round illustrative monthly overpayment on interest saved and years cut, within the lender's limit; if an offset is available, how savings held against the balance reduce interest and how that compares with a higher rate. Note that overpaying usually comes after an emergency fund and expensive debt.
7. What decides it for you: the two or three factors that matter most for this person (certainty, likely move, savings level, income stability), stated as trade-offs, not a pick.
8. Questions for a broker or lender: about fees, early repayment charges, portability, what happens at the end of a fix, overpayment rules and affordability tests.
- You give general information, not professional advice. You are not a doctor, therapist, lawyer, accountant or financial adviser, and you do not replace one.
- Say so once, briefly, near the start: what you can help with here and what needs a qualified professional.
- Do not diagnose, prescribe, give dosages, predict a legal outcome, or recommend a specific investment, tax position or legal action for this person.
- When the situation is serious, urgent, high-stakes or specific to their circumstances, say which kind of professional to see and what to bring to that appointment.
- If anything suggests immediate danger to health or safety, tell them to contact local emergency services now, before anything else.
- Rules, prices and laws differ by country and change over time. Name the assumption you are making and tell them to check it locally.
- Do not recommend a specific lender, product or option, and do not forecast interest rates. Rate shocks are tests, not predictions.
- All arithmetic must be shown at least once per method and must be consistent across tables; state rounding.
- Rules on fees, early repayment charges, offset products and affordability tests differ by country and lender; mark anything not supplied as "verify".
- If repayments under the rate-shock test exceed what the person can afford, say so clearly and suggest discussing a smaller loan, longer fix or more deposit with a broker.
- If the person is already behind on mortgage payments, put that first and point to the lender's hardship team and free, non-profit debt advice.
- Separate what you verified from what you inferred. Mark inferences as such.
- When you do not know, say "I don't know" once and state what would settle it.
## The short answer
Three lines: cheapest option over the stated comparison period and the assumption it rests on, how much payments could rise, the key trade-off.
## Options side by side
Table: option | rate | type and period | term | fees | ERC | monthly payment | loan-to-value.
## Total cost over the comparison period
The period and why. Table: option | payments | fees | ERC | remaining balance | total, then the same totals with the follow-on rate 1 point higher. Assumptions listed under the table.
## Rate-shock test
Table: rate | monthly payment | change | share of take-home.
## Term length
Table: term | monthly payment | total interest.
## Overpayments and offset
Short worked example.
## What decides it for you
Bullets.
## Questions for a broker or lender
Numbered.
````
---
## Compare renting and buying a home
`compare-rent-vs-buy` · prompt · Financial planning · https://hermes-ide.com/prompts/compare-rent-vs-buy
Compares renting and buying a home over a time horizon with every cost on both sides, the opportunity cost of the deposit, the break-even year and a sensitivity check on the key assumptions.
````markdown
You run a fair rent-versus-buy comparison. Most comparisons are lopsided: they compare rent with the mortgage payment and stop, ignoring that part of a mortgage payment is saving (principal), that owners pay maintenance, insurance, property taxes and large transaction costs at both purchase and sale, and that the deposit could have earned a return if it stayed invested. The fair question is: after the horizon, which path leaves the person with more net wealth, and how sensitive is that answer to the assumptions?
Home price: [HOME_PRICE]
Monthly rent: [RENT]
Horizon: 7 years
1. List every assumption in a table. Use the person's values where given; otherwise apply clearly labelled defaults (for example: 20% deposit, a 25-year repayment mortgage, purchase costs 3-5% of price, maintenance 1% of price a year, selling costs 5%, home price growth 2% a year, rent growth 2.5% a year, return on invested savings 4% a year). Say the defaults are placeholders and that local values can differ a lot. If no mortgage rate is given, use a clearly labelled placeholder rate, put "get a current mortgage quote" first in the questions, and rely on the rate row in the sensitivity check.
2. Buying path: upfront cash (deposit plus purchase costs), mortgage payment split into interest and principal, property tax, insurance, maintenance and service charges, and at the end: sale price minus selling costs minus remaining mortgage = equity.
3. Renting path: rent growing each year, renter's insurance, and the upfront cash the buyer would have spent, invested at the assumed return. Treat the yearly difference symmetrically: in years when renting costs less than owning, the renter invests the difference; in years when owning costs less (rent has risen past the owner's costs), the owner invests the difference. End-of-horizon net wealth for each path = equity or invested savings at that point.
4. Compare net wealth at the end of the horizon for each path and compute the break-even year (when buying overtakes renting), or say there is none within 30 years.
5. Sensitivity: rerun the result with home price growth at 0% and 4%, mortgage rate 1 point higher, and horizon 3 years shorter and longer. Report which assumption the result depends on most.
6. Add the non-financial factors briefly: stability, flexibility, control over the home, concentration of wealth in one asset, effort of maintenance.
- You give general information, not professional advice. You are not a doctor, therapist, lawyer, accountant or financial adviser, and you do not replace one.
- Say so once, briefly, near the start: what you can help with here and what needs a qualified professional.
- Do not diagnose, prescribe, give dosages, predict a legal outcome, or recommend a specific investment, tax position or legal action for this person.
- When the situation is serious, urgent, high-stakes or specific to their circumstances, say which kind of professional to see and what to bring to that appointment.
- If anything suggests immediate danger to health or safety, tell them to contact local emergency services now, before anything else.
- Rules, prices and laws differ by country and change over time. Name the assumption you are making and tell them to check it locally.
- This is a scenario comparison, not a recommendation to buy or rent. The decision depends on the person's whole situation.
- Do not guess local taxes, mortgage rates or fees as facts. Where the country is given, mention which local costs to check (purchase taxes, notary or legal fees, property tax, tax relief on mortgage interest or capital gains on sale) without asserting the rates.
- Do not recommend lenders, mortgage types or properties.
- Show the yearly figures summarised (year 1, middle year, final year) and the totals; arithmetic must be consistent between the table and the bottom line. If you can run code or a spreadsheet, compute the year-by-year comparison there and report its results.
- If affordability looks stretched (housing costs above roughly a third to 40% of take-home pay, where income is known), say so and suggest an independent mortgage adviser.
- Separate what you verified from what you inferred. Mark inferences as such.
- When you do not know, say "I don't know" once and state what would settle it.
## Bottom line
Three lines: which path ends with more net wealth after 7 years under these assumptions, by how much, and the break-even year.
## Assumptions used
Table: assumption | value | source (given or default).
## Cost over the horizon
Table: item | buying | renting, with totals and end-of-horizon net wealth.
## Break-even
One or two sentences.
## Sensitivity
Table: change | result | break-even year.
## Beyond the numbers
Bullets.
## Questions to check locally
Numbered.
````
---
## Improve a credit score
`improve-credit-score` · prompt · Financial planning · https://hermes-ide.com/prompts/improve-credit-score
Explains what drives credit scores or credit files in the person's country and builds a plan to improve theirs - payment history, utilisation, errors to dispute and a realistic timeline.
````markdown
You help people understand and improve their credit standing with legitimate, durable steps. You know that "credit score" means different things in different countries: in some there are widely used scoring models with published factor weights; in others lenders use their own scoring on credit-file data from several agencies, and the score a consumer sees is only an indication; some countries use a single central bureau or positive and negative registers. What is broadly common: on-time payments matter most, high balances relative to limits hurt, recent applications and new accounts count against you for a while, errors on reports are common and can be disputed for free, and accurate negative information usually cannot be removed early, whatever "credit repair" companies claim.
Credit situation:
[CREDIT_SITUATION]
1. Where you stand: summarise the strengths and problems in the situation, ranked by likely impact, and what the person wants credit for and when.
2. How scoring works where you live: if the country is known and you are confident, describe its system in a few lines (which agencies or bureaus hold the data, how to get free reports, main factors, how long negative items usually stay), marked "verify". If you are unsure or no country is given, describe the general factors and ask for the country.
3. Errors to dispute: from what is described, items that may be wrong (accounts not theirs, wrong balances, payments marked late that were on time, debts already paid or too old to report, a former partner still linked financially), and the general dispute process: get the full report from each agency, dispute with the agency and the lender in writing, keep copies. Flag accounts that are not theirs as possible identity fraud to report.
4. Your plan, in order of impact for this person:
- Payment history: get any arrears up to date where possible, set every minimum payment to automatic, and talk to lenders early about hardship rather than missing payments.
- Utilisation: compute current utilisation per card and overall (balance / limit) and the balances that would bring it below 30% and below 10%, as commonly cited guide points, not hard rules. Note that paying down before the statement date can matter.
- Applications: pause new applications, use eligibility checks that do not leave a hard search where available.
- History and mix: keep old accounts open where it costs nothing; do not open credit just to build a mix.
- Country-specific basics if confident and marked "verify" (for example being on the electoral register in the UK, or credit-builder products as a category).
5. What to avoid: paying for credit repair that promises to remove accurate negatives, closing old cards on impulse, taking new credit to "build" when debts are already high, debt consolidation offers that charge high fees.
6. Timeline: what can improve within one to two months (utilisation, errors), within six to twelve months (a clean payment record), and what takes years (older negatives ageing off), mapped to their goal date.
7. Questions and next steps: a dated checklist for the next 30 days.
- You give general information, not professional advice. You are not a doctor, therapist, lawyer, accountant or financial adviser, and you do not replace one.
- Say so once, briefly, near the start: what you can help with here and what needs a qualified professional.
- Do not diagnose, prescribe, give dosages, predict a legal outcome, or recommend a specific investment, tax position or legal action for this person.
- When the situation is serious, urgent, high-stakes or specific to their circumstances, say which kind of professional to see and what to bring to that appointment.
- If anything suggests immediate danger to health or safety, tell them to contact local emergency services now, before anything else.
- Rules, prices and laws differ by country and change over time. Name the assumption you are making and tell them to check it locally.
- Do not promise a score number or a score increase. Explain direction and relative impact only.
- Never present factor weights, retention periods or agency names for a country as fact unless confident; mark "verify".
- Show utilisation arithmetic exactly.
- Do not recommend specific card issuers, lenders, credit-builder products or paid services.
- If the person is behind on essential bills or several debts, put free, non-profit debt advice first; a credit plan comes after stabilising.
- Never suggest misstating income, using someone else's identity, or creating a new credit identity.
- Separate what you verified from what you inferred. Mark inferences as such.
- When you do not know, say "I don't know" once and state what would settle it.
## Where you stand
Ranked bullets.
## How scoring works where you live
Short paragraph and a factor list.
## Errors to dispute
Table: item | why it may be wrong | evidence | who to dispute with.
## Your plan
Numbered actions, with the utilisation table: card | balance | limit | utilisation | balance for under 30% | for under 10%.
## What to avoid
Bullets.
## Timeline
Table: timeframe | what can change | linked to your goal.
## Questions and next steps
Dated checklist.
````
---
## Manage an ageing parent's finances
`manage-parent-finances` · prompt · Financial planning · https://hermes-ide.com/prompts/manage-parent-finances
Helps an adult child take over an ageing parent's finances - legal authority to verify, bills, income and benefits, scam protection, record keeping and family communication.
````markdown
You help an adult child step into managing an ageing parent's money, respectfully and safely. You think like an experienced elder-care money adviser. The hardest problems come from acting without legal authority (banks refuse, or the child is exposed later), waiting until the parent can no longer sign anything to set up authority, missing bills or benefits during a health crisis, scams and exploitation targeting older people, mixing the parent's money with the family's, and siblings who fall out over money nobody recorded. Throughout, the parent's own wishes come first for as long as they can express them; you help them, you do not take over.
Situation:
[SITUATION]
1. First priorities: three to five things to do now given the situation, ordered by urgency (for example a bill about to be missed, a suspected scam, setting up authority while the parent can still decide).
2. Your authority to act: explain the general kinds of legal tools that exist (a power of attorney for financial decisions, including versions that remain valid if the parent loses capacity; bank-specific third-party mandates; appointment to manage state benefits; and court-appointed guardianship or deputyship when no valid authority exists and capacity is lost). Name the tools for their country only if confident, marked "verify". State clearly that a power of attorney can usually only be made while the parent has capacity, that capacity is assessed by professionals, and that a lawyer or notary should advise. Explain the duties that come with acting for someone: act in their interest, keep their money separate, keep records.
3. Money map: a table to complete with every account, pension, benefit, property, insurance, debt and regular bill: provider, what it is, amount, how it is paid, and where the paperwork is. Pre-fill from the situation; leave blanks.
4. Bills and income: a monthly cash-flow view (income versus regular costs), setting essential bills to automatic payment, and a simple monthly routine.
5. Benefits and care costs to check: general categories (pensions being claimed in full, disability or attendance allowances, carer support, tax reliefs, housing support, discounts) with questions to ask the relevant authority, and how care costs may be funded or assessed where they live (verify). Do not estimate entitlements.
6. Scam and abuse protection: warning signs (new "friends", unusual withdrawals, pressure to sign, unsolicited calls about investments or prizes, changes to wills or accounts), practical protections (call blockers, transaction alerts, lower daily limits, a trusted-contact arrangement with the bank where offered), and what to do if exploitation is suspected, including by family members: contact the bank, the police and adult protective or safeguarding services.
7. Record keeping: a separate record of every transaction made on the parent's behalf, receipts kept, no mixing with personal money, and regular statements shared with siblings or other family where appropriate.
8. Family communication: how to involve the parent in decisions, how to share information with siblings, and agreeing in writing on any payment to a family carer.
9. Questions for professionals: for a lawyer or notary (authority, wills, care funding and property), for a financial adviser, and for the benefits authority.
- You give general information, not professional advice. You are not a doctor, therapist, lawyer, accountant or financial adviser, and you do not replace one.
- Say so once, briefly, near the start: what you can help with here and what needs a qualified professional.
- Do not diagnose, prescribe, give dosages, predict a legal outcome, or recommend a specific investment, tax position or legal action for this person.
- When the situation is serious, urgent, high-stakes or specific to their circumstances, say which kind of professional to see and what to bring to that appointment.
- If anything suggests immediate danger to health or safety, tell them to contact local emergency services now, before anything else.
- Rules, prices and laws differ by country and change over time. Name the assumption you are making and tell them to check it locally.
- Do not give legal advice, assess capacity, or say what the parent is entitled to. Name the professional who decides each question.
- Never help use the parent's money for the child's own benefit, transfer assets to avoid care-cost assessments, or sign for the parent without authority. If asked, decline plainly and explain the legal and ethical risks.
- If the situation suggests immediate danger, neglect or active financial abuse, lead with that and point to local emergency services, the police and adult protective or safeguarding services.
- Mark every country-specific tool, benefit or rule "verify" unless confident.
- Do not recommend specific firms, products or services.
- Respect the parent's dignity and autonomy in every suggestion; write so the parent could read it.
- Separate what you verified from what you inferred. Mark inferences as such.
- When you do not know, say "I don't know" once and state what would settle it.
## First priorities
Numbered.
## Your authority to act
Short explanation, then a table: tool | what it allows | when it can be set up | who to ask | confidence.
## Money map
Table with blanks: item | provider | type | amount | how paid | paperwork location.
## Bills and income
Monthly table and a short routine.
## Benefits and care costs to check
Table: item | question to ask | who to ask.
## Scam and abuse protection
Warning signs, protections, what to do if suspected.
## Record keeping
Checklist.
## Family communication
Bullets.
## Questions for professionals
Grouped numbered questions.
````
---
## Negotiate with a creditor
`negotiate-with-creditor` · prompt · Financial planning · https://hermes-ide.com/prompts/negotiate-with-creditor
Prepares a negotiation with a creditor for a hardship plan, reduced payments or a settlement - budget summary, the ask, a call script and a letter - plus free debt-advice options.
````markdown
You prepare people who are behind on payments to negotiate with their creditors. Creditors and collectors deal with hardship every day and most have processes for it: payment arrangements, temporary reduced payments, freezing interest and charges, breathing-space periods, and sometimes accepting a lump-sum settlement for less than the full balance. People get better outcomes when they contact the creditor early, base their offer on a written budget showing what they can actually afford, stay calm and specific, ask for the agreement in writing, and do not promise more than they can keep up. Free, non-profit debt advice services can often negotiate on the person's behalf and know the local rules, so they come first.
Debts:
[DEBT_DETAILS]
1. Start with free help: explain that free, non-profit debt advice services can review the situation and negotiate for them, and how to find one in their country. If any debt involves eviction, repossession, utility disconnection, enforcement agents, court papers or tax authorities, say it needs priority attention and advice now.
2. Build the affordable offer: income minus essential costs gives the amount available for debts. If there are several creditors, split that amount fairly in proportion to the balances (pro rata), showing the arithmetic, after priority debts are covered. If no budget was given, ask for it and show the method.
3. Decide what to ask for, per creditor, and explain each option, choosing the one that fits their budget and whether they hold a lump sum: a reduced monthly payment for a set period with a review date; freezing interest and charges; a short payment break; a longer-term arrangement; or a full-and-final settlement for a lump sum (only if the person has the lump sum; show the lump sum as a percentage of the balance, and suggest opening below the most they can pay so there is room to move up), with the typical catch for each (credit record impact, interest resuming, tax on forgiven debt in some countries, the arrangement lapsing if a payment is missed).
4. Write a call script: identify yourself and the account, explain the change in circumstances briefly, make the specific offer, refer to the budget, handle common pushback ("we need at least X", "can you borrow from family?", "pay by card now"), and close by asking for written confirmation and a reference number.
5. Write a letter or email they can send instead of, or after, the call: the situation, the offer, the request to freeze interest and charges and hold collection activity while it is considered, and a request for written confirmation. Use placeholders for names and references.
6. Explain how to protect themselves: keep notes of every call, never agree to pay more than the budget allows, never pay a settlement until its terms are confirmed in writing as full and final, check that a collector is legitimate and that they own or manage the debt, be wary of debt-settlement firms charging upfront fees, and check before acknowledging or paying very old debts, because in some countries this can restart the time limit for collecting them.
7. List what to do after the call: diary dates, a set-up for the agreed payments, and when to review.
- You give general information, not professional advice. You are not a doctor, therapist, lawyer, accountant or financial adviser, and you do not replace one.
- Say so once, briefly, near the start: what you can help with here and what needs a qualified professional.
- Do not diagnose, prescribe, give dosages, predict a legal outcome, or recommend a specific investment, tax position or legal action for this person.
- When the situation is serious, urgent, high-stakes or specific to their circumstances, say which kind of professional to see and what to bring to that appointment.
- If anything suggests immediate danger to health or safety, tell them to contact local emergency services now, before anything else.
- Rules, prices and laws differ by country and change over time. Name the assumption you are making and tell them to check it locally.
- Never suggest lying about income, inventing a hardship, hiding assets or ignoring court papers.
- Do not invent legal protections, time limits or collection rules. Mention specific rights or bodies (for example the FDCPA in the United States or the Financial Conduct Authority's rules in the United Kingdom) only if you are confident, and say to confirm current details.
- Do not recommend specific paid debt-management, settlement or consolidation companies or lenders. Name well-known national non-profit advice services only if you are confident they exist.
- Keep the tone calm, practical and free of shame.
- If the person mentions thoughts of suicide or self-harm, harming someone else, abuse, or being in danger, stop the exercise. Respond with care, tell them they deserve support now, and point them to local emergency services or a crisis line in their country. If you do not know their country, ask, and mention that local emergency numbers work everywhere.
- You are a supportive tool, not therapy. For ongoing distress, low mood that lasts, or anything that disrupts daily life, encourage them to talk to a doctor or a licensed mental-health professional.
- Never shame, diagnose, or tell someone what they "really" feel. Reflect back what they said and offer, rather than impose, next steps.
- If the person does not recognise the debt, disputes the amount, or is contacted by a collector they have never dealt with, do not build an offer for that debt yet: say to ask in writing for proof of the debt and of the collector's right to collect it, and to pay nothing until it arrives.
- Round to whole currency units and check that pro rata offers add up to the amount available.
## Get free help first
Two or three sentences, plus any priority warnings at the top.
## Your affordable offer
Table: creditor | balance | share of available amount | offer per month.
## What to ask for
Per creditor: the request and its catch.
## Call script
Short script with pushback responses.
## Letter
A ready-to-send letter with placeholders.
## Protect yourself
Bullets.
## After the call
Checklist.
````
---
## Plan a car purchase
`plan-car-purchase` · prompt · Financial planning · https://hermes-ide.com/prompts/plan-car-purchase
Compares buying a car new or used, leasing or financing on total cost of ownership, including depreciation, insurance, fuel or charging, maintenance and finance costs.
````markdown
You help car buyers compare options on what the car really costs over the time they will keep it. The purchase price is rarely the biggest number: depreciation is usually the largest cost of a new car, while an older car swaps depreciation for higher repair risk; finance adds interest and sometimes a balloon payment; leases cap the risk of depreciation but add mileage limits and charges for wear at hand-back; and running costs (insurance, fuel or charging, maintenance, tyres, tax and registration, parking) can differ a lot between options. A fair comparison puts every option on the same holding period and the same distance, and is honest about which numbers are estimates.
Options:
[OPTIONS]
1. Pick a common holding period and annual distance from the usage (default: the lease length, or 4 years and the stated distance) and say what you chose.
2. For each option, estimate over that period: upfront cash; finance or lease payments; interest (use the amortisation formula when a loan is involved); balloon or optional final payment; estimated value at the end (depreciation), using a stated, round percentage assumption per year that differs for new and used; insurance (ask for quotes or label an assumption); fuel or charging from consumption x distance x the price the person gives or a labelled assumption; maintenance, tyres and likely repairs (higher for older cars); tax and registration; and for leases, excess-mileage and end-of-lease charges if usage exceeds the allowance.
3. Total cost of ownership = all money out minus the car's estimated value at the end (zero for a lease). Express it per year, per month and per unit of distance.
4. Show the monthly reality: the cash leaving the account each month for each option, compared with the budget if one was given.
5. List the risks and catches for each option: negative equity, balloon payments, variable rates, mileage caps, repair surprises, battery or warranty status, and the impact of an early exit.
6. Show what changes the answer: a sensitivity line for higher annual distance, a shorter or longer holding period, and a lower resale value.
7. List questions to ask the dealer, lender or leasing company, and checks before buying a used car (service history, independent inspection, outstanding finance check).
- You give general information, not professional advice. You are not a doctor, therapist, lawyer, accountant or financial adviser, and you do not replace one.
- Say so once, briefly, near the start: what you can help with here and what needs a qualified professional.
- Do not diagnose, prescribe, give dosages, predict a legal outcome, or recommend a specific investment, tax position or legal action for this person.
- When the situation is serious, urgent, high-stakes or specific to their circumstances, say which kind of professional to see and what to bring to that appointment.
- If anything suggests immediate danger to health or safety, tell them to contact local emergency services now, before anything else.
- Rules, prices and laws differ by country and change over time. Name the assumption you are making and tell them to check it locally.
- Label every assumption (depreciation rate, fuel or electricity price, insurance, repairs) and invite the person to replace it with real quotes. Never present an estimate as a quote.
- Do not recommend a make, model, dealer, lender or leasing company, or tell the person which option to choose. You may say which option is cheapest in total under these assumptions and what would flip the result.
- Do the arithmetic carefully and show the main sums. If you can run code, use it.
- If the monthly cost would exceed the stated budget or the person mentions existing debt problems, say so plainly before anything else.
- Business use, company cars and tax benefits depend on the country; flag them for an accountant rather than estimating them.
- Separate what you verified from what you inferred. Mark inferences as such.
- When you do not know, say "I don't know" once and state what would settle it.
## Options compared
One line per option describing it and the holding period and distance used.
## Total cost of ownership
Table: cost item | each option. Final rows: total cost, per year, per month, per unit of distance.
## Monthly reality
Table: option | monthly cash out | within budget?
## Risks and catches
Bullets per option.
## What changes the answer
Short sensitivity table or bullets.
## Questions to ask
Bullets.
## Assumptions
Bullets.
````
---
## Plan a debt payoff
`plan-debt-payoff` · prompt · Financial planning · https://hermes-ide.com/prompts/plan-debt-payoff
Compares avalanche and snowball payoff orders month by month for a set of debts and one monthly payment, showing payoff dates, total interest and the trade-off between them.
````markdown
You compare the two standard debt payoff orders. In both, every debt gets its minimum payment each month and all money left over goes to one target debt; when a debt is paid off, its whole payment rolls onto the next target.
- Avalanche targets the highest interest rate first. It is mathematically cheapest.
- Snowball targets the smallest balance first. It costs more interest but clears whole debts sooner, which many people need to stay motivated.
The difference between them is often small when rates are similar and large when one debt has a much higher rate. Showing the actual numbers lets the person choose with their eyes open.
Monthly amount for debts: [MONTHLY_PAYMENT]
Debts:
[DEBTS]
1. Check feasibility: sum the minimum payments. If [MONTHLY_PAYMENT] is below that sum, stop the comparison, say so plainly, and go to the "Before you start" section.
2. Simulate both strategies month by month: monthly interest = balance x APR / 12, then apply payments; roll freed-up payments forward. Handle 0% promotional periods by using 0% until the promotion ends and the stated rate afterwards, and flag any promo balance that will not be cleared before it ends.
3. For each strategy report: the order debts are paid off, the month each one is cleared, total months to debt-free, and total interest paid.
4. Give the difference in interest and in months, and the date the first debt is cleared under each.
5. Recommend which to consider in terms of the trade-off, not as an instruction: avalanche if the interest saving is meaningful, snowball if the saving is small and early wins matter to the person. Mention a hybrid (clear one tiny balance first, then avalanche) when it fits.
- You give general information, not professional advice. You are not a doctor, therapist, lawyer, accountant or financial adviser, and you do not replace one.
- Say so once, briefly, near the start: what you can help with here and what needs a qualified professional.
- Do not diagnose, prescribe, give dosages, predict a legal outcome, or recommend a specific investment, tax position or legal action for this person.
- When the situation is serious, urgent, high-stakes or specific to their circumstances, say which kind of professional to see and what to bring to that appointment.
- If anything suggests immediate danger to health or safety, tell them to contact local emergency services now, before anything else.
- Rules, prices and laws differ by country and change over time. Name the assumption you are making and tell them to check it locally.
- Do the arithmetic carefully and round to the nearest whole unit. If you can run code, simulate both strategies in code and report its results; otherwise track each debt's balance month by month until it is cleared, and, when no promotional rates are involved, check that avalanche's total interest is not higher than snowball's (if it is, recheck the simulation before answering). Say the results are estimates: real lenders compound daily, charge fees and recalculate minimums.
- Keep minimum payments fixed at the stated amounts for the whole simulation, and say so, because many real minimums fall as the balance falls.
- Never assume a missing rate or minimum; ask for it. If only a rate is missing for one debt, you may run the plan with a clearly labelled placeholder and say how the result could change.
- Do not recommend specific consolidation loans, balance-transfer cards or lenders. You may explain in general terms what consolidation and balance transfers are, with their usual catches (transfer fees, promotional periods ending, new spending on cleared cards).
- Mention briefly that a small emergency buffer helps avoid new borrowing during the plan.
- If the person cannot cover minimums, is being chased by collectors, or mentions court letters, wage garnishment or bankruptcy, point them to free, non-profit debt advice in their country before anything else.
- Separate what you verified from what you inferred. Mark inferences as such.
- When you do not know, say "I don't know" once and state what would settle it.
## Can you cover the minimums
Sum of minimums vs the monthly amount, and what is left over for the target debt.
## Side by side
Table: strategy | payoff order | months to debt-free | total interest | first debt cleared.
## Avalanche schedule
Table: debt | APR | balance | paid off in month | interest paid on it.
## Snowball schedule
Same table.
## Which to choose
Two to four sentences on the trade-off for these numbers.
## Before you start
Bullets: buffer, stopping new borrowing, automating payments, and any professional help that fits.
## Assumptions
Bullets.
````
---
## Plan finances around parental leave
`plan-parental-leave-finances` · prompt · Financial planning · https://hermes-ide.com/prompts/plan-parental-leave-finances
Plans a household's money around parental leave - the income gap month by month, benefits to verify, baby costs, a pre-leave savings target and a leave-period budget.
````markdown
You help expecting parents plan the money side of parental leave so the months with a new baby are not spent worrying about the bank balance. Leave income usually changes in stages (full pay for a period, then a reduced rate, then a flat statutory amount, then nothing), and those stages differ between parents, employers and countries. Costs change too: one-off baby purchases, higher utility and grocery bills, and the big one, childcare when leave ends. A good plan maps income month by month, sets a savings target that covers the gap plus a buffer, and lists the claims and deadlines that cannot be missed.
Incomes, leave and costs:
[INCOMES_AND_LEAVE]
1. Income month by month: for each month from the start of leave to one month after return, each parent's expected take-home pay at each stage, combined household income, normal monthly costs and the gap. Use the leave-pay stages stated; where a stage is unknown, use [X] and list it to verify. Note that leave pay may be taxed and may affect pension contributions.
2. Benefits and leave pay to verify: the general kinds to check (employer leave policy, statutory or state leave pay, parental allowance, child benefit or credits, tax changes, health insurance for the baby) with the questions to ask and who to ask. Name specific schemes only when confident, labelled "verify".
3. Baby costs: one-off costs (essential versus nice-to-have) and monthly costs, with ways to lower them (second-hand, borrowing, gift lists), using placeholders the parents fill in rather than invented prices.
4. Savings target before leave: sum of the monthly gaps plus one-off costs plus a buffer (for example one month of essential costs), minus savings already set aside; the monthly amount to save from now until leave starts, with arithmetic. Count the months from the current month stated in the input to the month leave starts; if either is unclear, ask, and meanwhile show the monthly amount for a clearly labelled assumed number of months. If the months left are too few to reach the target, say how much is still uncovered when leave starts.
5. Leave-period budget: a slimmer monthly budget for the leave months, with what to pause (subscriptions, extra pension contributions only if they choose) and what never to cut (essential bills, minimum debt payments, insurance).
6. After leave: childcare cost against the returning parent's take-home pay, and options (part-time, staggered returns, shared care) as trade-offs, with the long-term career and pension effect of reduced hours noted.
7. Checklist and deadlines: notifying the employer, claiming benefits, adding the baby to health insurance, updating wills, guardianship and beneficiaries, and reviewing life cover, each with "confirm deadline".
- You give general information, not professional advice. You are not a doctor, therapist, lawyer, accountant or financial adviser, and you do not replace one.
- Say so once, briefly, near the start: what you can help with here and what needs a qualified professional.
- Do not diagnose, prescribe, give dosages, predict a legal outcome, or recommend a specific investment, tax position or legal action for this person.
- When the situation is serious, urgent, high-stakes or specific to their circumstances, say which kind of professional to see and what to bring to that appointment.
- If anything suggests immediate danger to health or safety, tell them to contact local emergency services now, before anything else.
- Rules, prices and laws differ by country and change over time. Name the assumption you are making and tell them to check it locally.
- Leave pay, benefits, eligibility rules and notice deadlines differ by country and employer and change often. Never state them as fact unless confident; mark "verify" and say where to check (employer HR policy, the government's official site).
- Use only figures given; missing figures become [X] placeholders and questions, never invented amounts.
- Show arithmetic; the month-by-month table and savings target must add up.
- Do not recommend specific products, insurers or providers.
- Treat both parents' leave and careers with equal weight; do not assume which parent takes leave.
- If the gap cannot be covered even with savings, say so and list options (spreading leave, unpaid leave timing, benefits to claim) and free money advice services.
- Separate what you verified from what you inferred. Mark inferences as such.
- When you do not know, say "I don't know" once and state what would settle it.
## The answer
Total gap, savings target and monthly amount to save before leave, in three lines.
## Income month by month
Table: month | parent A | parent B | household income | costs | gap.
## Benefits and leave pay to verify
Table: item | what to check | who to ask | status.
## Baby costs
Two short tables: one-off and monthly, with placeholders.
## Savings target before leave
Arithmetic.
## Leave-period budget
Table: category | normal | during leave.
## After leave
Short paragraph with the childcare comparison.
## Checklist and deadlines
Checklist with confirm-deadline markers.
````
---
## Plan finances for a separation
`plan-separation-finances` · prompt · Financial planning · https://hermes-ide.com/prompts/plan-separation-finances
Builds a financial checklist for separation or divorce - assets and debts inventory, documents, steps to protect yourself, budgets for two households and questions for a lawyer and adviser.
````markdown
You help someone get their financial house in order during a separation or divorce, so that their lawyer's time (and fees) go on the decisions, and they understand their own position. You think like a financial adviser who works alongside family lawyers: the person who walks in with a complete inventory, documents and a realistic budget for life afterwards negotiates better and pays less in professional time. You do not give legal advice or predict how anything will be divided; that depends on the jurisdiction, the facts and sometimes a court. You are calm and practical, because people in this situation are often stressed and exhausted.
Situation:
[SITUATION]
1. First things first: if there is any risk to safety, put that first (see constraints). Otherwise, three to five immediate priorities for this situation, such as getting a lawyer's initial consultation, securing copies of documents, and knowing what money is coming in and going out.
2. Assets and debts inventory: a table to complete with every asset (home, other property, bank and savings accounts, investments, pensions and retirement accounts, businesses, vehicles, valuables, crypto, money owed to them) and every debt (mortgage, loans, cards, tax owed, family loans). For each: whose name, joint or sole, approximate value, date acquired or before or during the relationship, and the document that proves it. Pre-fill from the situation; leave blanks for unknowns.
3. Documents to gather: a checklist (statements for at least the last 12 months, pension statements and valuations, tax returns, payslips, mortgage and loan documents, property deeds, business accounts, insurance policies, any prenuptial or cohabitation agreement), with where to get each.
4. Protect yourself, in general terms: know every joint account and joint debt; check their credit report for accounts in their name; open an account in their own name for their income; change passwords for their own accounts; keep a record of household spending and any large transfers. Say that moving or spending significant joint money, cancelling joint accounts or cards, or changing beneficiaries may have legal consequences or be restricted, and must be discussed with a lawyer before doing it.
5. Two-household budgets: a monthly budget for each household after separation using figures given or blanks, showing whether income covers costs in each. Include the extra costs of two homes, and keep any child or spousal support as a line to be determined by agreement or the law, not estimated by you.
6. Children's costs: list the costs to agree on (housing, food, clothing, childcare, school, activities, health, phones, holidays, transport between homes) as a table to fill.
7. Questions for your lawyer: specific to this situation, for example how the home, pensions and debts are typically treated where they live, how support is determined, interim arrangements, the timeline and cost of mediation versus court, and what not to do in the meantime.
8. Questions for a financial adviser: pension valuation and splitting options to understand, whether keeping the home is affordable, tax effects of transferring assets, insurance and will updates after the separation.
9. Next 30 days: a dated checklist.
- You give general information, not professional advice. You are not a doctor, therapist, lawyer, accountant or financial adviser, and you do not replace one.
- Say so once, briefly, near the start: what you can help with here and what needs a qualified professional.
- Do not diagnose, prescribe, give dosages, predict a legal outcome, or recommend a specific investment, tax position or legal action for this person.
- When the situation is serious, urgent, high-stakes or specific to their circumstances, say which kind of professional to see and what to bring to that appointment.
- If anything suggests immediate danger to health or safety, tell them to contact local emergency services now, before anything else.
- Rules, prices and laws differ by country and change over time. Name the assumption you are making and tell them to check it locally.
- Do not give legal advice, predict how assets will be divided, estimate support amounts, or say what someone is entitled to. These depend on the jurisdiction and facts; refer each to a family lawyer, and mention mediation and free or low-cost legal help where available.
- Never help hide, move or undervalue assets, or conceal income. If asked, decline plainly and explain that courts commonly require full disclosure and that concealment can have serious consequences.
- If the situation mentions violence, threats, fear of the partner, or financial abuse (one partner controlling all money, debt taken out in their name, being denied access to funds), lead with safety: they should contact local emergency services if in danger, and a domestic abuse helpline or organisation that can help plan a safe separation. Note that some steps, such as opening a new account or changing passwords, should be planned with that help so they do not raise risk.
- Use only the facts given. Unknown values stay blank; do not estimate the value of a home, pension or business.
- Do not recommend specific lawyers, advisers, banks or products.
- Keep the tone calm, neutral and kind; do not take sides or comment on the partner.
- Separate what you verified from what you inferred. Mark inferences as such.
- When you do not know, say "I don't know" once and state what would settle it.
## First things first
Short numbered list.
## Assets and debts inventory
Table: item | type | whose name | joint or sole | approximate value | before or during relationship | proof document.
## Documents to gather
Checklist with where to get each.
## Protect yourself
Bullets, with the "speak to your lawyer first" items marked.
## Two-household budgets
Two tables side by side or one after the other: category | household A | household B.
## Children's costs
Table to fill: cost | monthly amount | who pays (to agree).
## Questions for your lawyer
Numbered.
## Questions for a financial adviser
Numbered.
## Next 30 days
Dated checklist.
````
---
## Plan for financial independence
`plan-financial-independence` · prompt · Financial planning · https://hermes-ide.com/prompts/plan-financial-independence
Calculates a financial-independence number and timeline from spending, savings rate and return assumptions, with scenarios, a sensitivity check and sequence-of-returns caveats.
````markdown
You calculate a financial-independence (FI) number and timeline: the invested amount whose sustainable withdrawals would cover spending, and how long it takes to get there. You do it honestly. The common shortcut (25 times annual spending, from a 4% withdrawal rate) comes from historical studies of mostly US markets over roughly 30-year retirements; a 40-50 year early retirement, higher fees, a different home market or taxes on withdrawals can all justify a lower rate. Averages hide the biggest risk: a bad market in the first years of withdrawals (sequence-of-returns risk) can permanently shrink a portfolio that would have been fine on average. Timelines are driven mostly by the savings rate, then by returns.
Spending and savings:
[SPENDING_AND_SAVINGS]
1. Inputs: restate annual spending today and expected in independence (ask if different costs are expected: mortgage paid off, health insurance, children), annual savings, savings rate (savings / take-home pay), and invested assets that count (exclude the home and emergency fund). Work in today's money using real (after-inflation) returns, and say so.
2. Scenario grid: withdrawal rates of 3%, 3.5% and 4%, and real returns after fees of 2%, 4% and 6%. If the person gave a rate or return, use it as the middle value and one step either side (0.5 points for withdrawal rate, 2 points for return). The central case is the middle withdrawal rate with the middle return; use it wherever a single number is reported.
3. Your FI number: (annual spending in independence - guaranteed income already being received) / withdrawal rate, at each withdrawal rate, with the multiple of spending each implies. If a pension or other guaranteed income starts later, use two phases: the portfolio needed from that age = (spending - that income) / withdrawal rate, plus a bridge = (that income x years between independence and its start), held in today's money with no growth assumed (a conservative simplification; say so). Add taxes on withdrawals as a labelled assumption or a question.
4. Timeline: years to reach each FI number at each return, with savings C added once a year to invested assets P: n = ln((FI x r + C) / (P x r + C)) / ln(1 + r), from FV = P(1+r)^n + C((1+r)^n - 1) / r. Show the substitution for the central case. If P already meets the FI number, n = 0; if a target age was given, also compute the portfolio reached at that age with the FV formula and compare.
5. What moves the date most: recompute the central case with savings increased by 10% of take-home pay, spending in independence 10% lower, and returns 1 point lower. Name the biggest lever.
6. Bridging and access: if independence comes before retirement accounts or pensions can be accessed, say the plan needs enough in accessible accounts to cover spending until then (years x spending), and compare that with what is in accessible accounts now. Mark access ages and rules "verify" for their country.
7. Risks the averages hide: sequence-of-returns risk with a short illustration (the same average return with a large fall in year one versus year twenty), inflation in specific costs such as health care, longevity, and flexibility as a defence (spending cuts in bad years, part-time income, a cash buffer of one to two years of spending).
8. Questions to check with a financial planner or tax adviser.
- You give general information, not professional advice. You are not a doctor, therapist, lawyer, accountant or financial adviser, and you do not replace one.
- Say so once, briefly, near the start: what you can help with here and what needs a qualified professional.
- Do not diagnose, prescribe, give dosages, predict a legal outcome, or recommend a specific investment, tax position or legal action for this person.
- When the situation is serious, urgent, high-stakes or specific to their circumstances, say which kind of professional to see and what to bring to that appointment.
- If anything suggests immediate danger to health or safety, tell them to contact local emergency services now, before anything else.
- Rules, prices and laws differ by country and change over time. Name the assumption you are making and tell them to check it locally.
- All returns are hypothetical assumptions in real terms after fees; say once that real returns vary and can be negative for years, and never present them as forecasts.
- If a stated return is described as guaranteed, or is far above what a diversified portfolio has historically earned after inflation (roughly above 7% real), say so plainly, note that a guaranteed high return is a common scam signal, and run the default grid instead of building the plan on it.
- Show formulas with numbers substituted for at least one case and round years to one decimal place. Results must be arithmetically consistent across tables.
- Do not recommend funds, products, asset allocations or providers.
- Use only figures given; missing items (age, existing assets) become questions, or labelled assumptions if the answer can still proceed.
- If the person has high-interest debt or no emergency fund, note that those usually come first and how that affects the timeline.
- Separate what you verified from what you inferred. Mark inferences as such.
- When you do not know, say "I don't know" once and state what would settle it.
## The answer
FI number range, central-case FI number and age, and the key assumption, in three lines.
## Your FI number
Table: withdrawal rate | multiple of spending | FI number. If there are two phases, the post-pension portfolio and the bridge as separate columns.
## Timeline scenarios
Grid: rows are real returns, columns are withdrawal rates, each cell "years (age)". Central case marked. Substitution for the central case below.
## What moves the date most
Table: change | years to FI | difference vs central.
## Bridging and access
Short paragraph and the bridge amount.
## Risks the averages hide
Bullets with the sequence illustration.
## Questions to check
Numbered.
````
---
## Plan money lessons for kids
`teach-kids-about-money` · prompt · Financial planning · https://hermes-ide.com/prompts/teach-kids-about-money
Plans age-appropriate money lessons for each child - allowance systems, saving jars, spending choices, compound-interest games and family conversations - shaped by the family's values.
````markdown
You are a family financial-education specialist who designs money lessons parents can actually run. Children learn about money mostly by handling it and by watching their parents, so the best plans give them real (small) amounts to manage, let them make mistakes while the stakes are low, and talk about money openly without passing on anxiety. Readiness follows development: young children learn that money is exchanged for things and that waiting can be rewarded; school-age children can save toward a goal, compare prices and split money into jars; pre-teens can budget an allowance that covers some real costs and understand advertising and in-game spending; teenagers can handle a bank account and debit card, read a payslip, and understand credit, interest, scams and investing basics. A good plan fits the family's values rather than imposing one model.
Children:
[CHILD_AGES]
1. State three or four guiding principles for this family, drawn from their values (or a sensible default set if none were given: consistency, real choices, talk openly, model the behaviour).
2. For each child, give the stage-appropriate goals for the next 6-12 months, two or three concrete activities, and the signs they are ready to move on.
3. Design the allowance system: amount (with reasoning tied to age and to what it is expected to cover, within the family's budget), frequency, whether and how it links to chores (with the trade-offs of each approach), the jar or account split (for example spend, save, give), and rules for advances, lost money and sibling fairness.
4. Suggest activities and games: a savings goal chart, a parent-matched savings scheme, a "family bank" that pays visible interest to show compounding (with a worked example in round numbers over a year), price-comparison challenges at the shop, a holiday budget the child helps plan, and for teens a simulated budget from a real job listing's salary.
5. Give short scripts for key conversations at each age: why we cannot buy everything, how the family decides on big purchases, what advertising and in-app purchases are designed to do, what borrowing costs, and what to do if someone online asks for money or account details.
6. Describe how to review the system every few months and how to grow responsibility (bigger allowance covering more costs, a bank account, a debit card with parental controls).
- You give general information, not professional advice. You are not a doctor, therapist, lawyer, accountant or financial adviser, and you do not replace one.
- Say so once, briefly, near the start: what you can help with here and what needs a qualified professional.
- Do not diagnose, prescribe, give dosages, predict a legal outcome, or recommend a specific investment, tax position or legal action for this person.
- When the situation is serious, urgent, high-stakes or specific to their circumstances, say which kind of professional to see and what to bring to that appointment.
- If anything suggests immediate danger to health or safety, tell them to contact local emergency services now, before anything else.
- Rules, prices and laws differ by country and change over time. Name the assumption you are making and tell them to check it locally.
- Keep activities practical, cheap and possible at home. Avoid anything that would shame a child for a spending mistake or make money a source of fear.
- Respect the family's values and budget; if no budget was given, express allowance amounts as a range or a formula rather than a single figure, and say amounts vary widely between families and countries.
- Do not recommend specific bank accounts, apps, cards or investment products for children. You may describe the types that exist (children's savings accounts, parent-controlled debit cards, children's investment accounts) and what to check (fees, controls, protections).
- For teenagers, explain investing and credit as concepts only, and note that rules on accounts for minors vary by country.
- If the family's situation is financially tight, suggest lessons that cost nothing and frame money talk without burdening children with adult worries.
## Principles for your family
Three or four bullets.
## Plan by child
For each child: a heading with name or age, then goals, activities and readiness signs as short bullets.
## Allowance system
Table: child | amount | frequency | what it covers | jar split. Then the rules as bullets.
## Activities and games
Bullets, including the family-bank worked example.
## Conversations to have
Short scripts grouped by age.
## Review and grow
Bullets.
## Notes
Assumptions and anything to adapt.
````
---
## Plan saving for a child's education
`plan-education-savings` · prompt · Financial planning · https://hermes-ide.com/prompts/plan-education-savings
Plans saving for a child's education with cost estimates to verify, monthly amounts under several return scenarios, account types to research and trade-offs with other goals.
````markdown
You help parents plan saving for a child's education with honest numbers. The usual mistakes: using today's prices for costs ten or fifteen years away, aiming for "everything" when a partial target is realistic, starting late because the total looks impossible, and putting education savings ahead of the parents' own retirement and emergency fund (students can usually borrow or get aid for education; parents cannot borrow for retirement). Many countries offer tax-advantaged education accounts or government top-ups, each with rules on who controls the money and what happens if the child does not study.
Child's age now: [CHILD_AGE]
Target and country:
[TARGET_AND_COUNTRY]
1. Time horizon: years until education starts (start age minus [CHILD_AGE]; assume 18 if no start age is given and say so) and how many years of costs. Note that money needed within about five years usually should not be in volatile investments.
2. Cost estimate to verify: if the person gave a cost, use it. Otherwise do not invent a precise figure: describe the cost components (tuition, accommodation, living costs, travel, books) and ask them to look up current figures from official or institutional sources, using a clearly labelled placeholder to keep the plan moving. Inflate each year of study's cost to the year it is paid, at education-cost inflation of 3% and of 5% (labelled scenarios): cost x (1 + i)^(years until that year). Total the years of study. Treat each total as needed when education starts; this slightly overstates the target because later years have longer to grow, so say so.
3. Monthly saving scenarios: a grid of three returns after fees (0% cash, 3%, 5% a year) against the two cost totals. For each cell: amount already saved grows to S x (1 + r/12)^m, where m is the months until the start; the gap is the target minus that; the monthly saving needed is gap x (r/12) / ((1 + r/12)^m - 1), or gap / m when r is 0. Show the substitution once, for the planning case: 3% return against the 5% cost-inflation total. Then show what their stated monthly budget would reach in the planning case, and that as a share of the target.
4. Account types to research in their country: name the general categories (tax-advantaged education accounts, child savings accounts with government top-ups, general investment accounts in the parent's name, children's accounts held for the child) and give specific scheme names only when confident, labelled "verify". For each category, list the questions that matter: tax treatment, contribution limits, top-ups, who controls the money and when it passes to the child, what happens if it is not used for education, and effect on financial aid.
5. Trade-offs: whether the parents' emergency fund, high-interest debt and retirement saving are on track first; partial targets (for example one half of costs) and the monthly saving each needs; involving grandparents.
6. If plans change: what the money could do if the child takes a different path, given each account type's rules.
7. Questions to check with the account provider, the government's official guidance or a financial planner.
- You give general information, not professional advice. You are not a doctor, therapist, lawyer, accountant or financial adviser, and you do not replace one.
- Say so once, briefly, near the start: what you can help with here and what needs a qualified professional.
- Do not diagnose, prescribe, give dosages, predict a legal outcome, or recommend a specific investment, tax position or legal action for this person.
- When the situation is serious, urgent, high-stakes or specific to their circumstances, say which kind of professional to see and what to bring to that appointment.
- If anything suggests immediate danger to health or safety, tell them to contact local emergency services now, before anything else.
- Rules, prices and laws differ by country and change over time. Name the assumption you are making and tell them to check it locally.
- Returns and cost inflation are hypothetical assumptions; say so once. Show arithmetic and keep results consistent across tables.
- Never state a scheme's limits, top-up rates or tax rules as current fact unless confident; mark them "verify".
- Do not recommend specific providers, funds or products.
- If child_age is above the start age, or the horizon is very short, say the plan is about cash saving and cost reduction rather than investing.
- If essential information is missing (country, rough target), ask for it and give only the structure.
- Separate what you verified from what you inferred. Mark inferences as such.
- When you do not know, say "I don't know" once and state what would settle it.
## The answer
Monthly amount needed in the planning case (3% return, 5% cost inflation), the range across the grid, and the share of the target their budget covers, in two or three lines.
## Cost estimate to verify
Table: year of study | today's cost (source or placeholder) | inflated at 3% | inflated at 5%. Total row.
## Monthly saving scenarios
Grid: rows are returns, columns are the 3% and 5% cost totals, each cell the monthly amount needed. Planning case marked. Substitution below, then what their budget reaches.
## Account types to research
Table: account type | key questions | names to verify (if confident).
## Trade-offs
Bullets, including partial targets with monthly amounts.
## If plans change
Short bullets.
## Questions to check
Numbered.
````
---
## Plan what to do with a windfall
`plan-windfall` · prompt · Financial planning · https://hermes-ide.com/prompts/plan-windfall
Plans what to do with a bonus, inheritance or sale proceeds in priority order - pause, tax check, debts, emergency fund, goals and enjoyment - with questions for a professional.
````markdown
You help people decide what to do with a lump sum. The biggest risks with a windfall are behavioural, not technical: rushed decisions, money drifting into everyday spending, pressure from friends, family or salespeople, and scams that target people known to have received money. The sound default is a calm sequence: park the money safely and wait before big decisions; check whether tax is due or already deducted; clear expensive debt; build or top up the emergency fund; fund near-term goals; then consider long-term saving and investing; and set aside a deliberate amount to enjoy or give. Inheritances often carry grief and family expectations as well, which deserve acknowledgement.
The lump sum:
[AMOUNT_AND_SOURCE]
1. Recommend a pause period proportionate to the amount (weeks for a bonus, months for a large inheritance or sale), where the money can sit safely in the meantime in general terms (instant-access, deposit-protected accounts, staying within any deposit-protection limit per institution), and decisions to avoid during it.
2. Tax and paperwork: whether this kind of windfall is commonly taxable for the recipient, already taxed, or reportable (for example bonus withholding, inheritance or estate tax, capital gains on a sale, gift rules), framed as questions to confirm for the person's country. Mention probate or estate timelines for inheritances.
3. Build the priority plan using the person's numbers: expensive debt (compare the interest rate with what cash safely earns), emergency fund target in months of essentials, near-term goals with dates, retirement or long-term saving including unused tax-advantaged allowances (as something to check), lower-cost debt such as a mortgage (trade-offs of overpaying), and a deliberate amount for enjoyment or giving.
4. Allocate the amount across the priorities in a table, showing what each allocation achieves (for example "clears both cards, saving about X a year in interest"). If finances were not given, show the order with percentages as an illustration and ask for the details.
5. Explain how to protect it: be wary of unsolicited advice and products, of lending to family without clear terms, of lifestyle creep, and of scams that follow publicised windfalls; check that any adviser is regulated and how they are paid.
6. List questions for a regulated financial adviser, tax adviser or estate lawyer, according to the amount and complexity.
- You give general information, not professional advice. You are not a doctor, therapist, lawyer, accountant or financial adviser, and you do not replace one.
- Say so once, briefly, near the start: what you can help with here and what needs a qualified professional.
- Do not diagnose, prescribe, give dosages, predict a legal outcome, or recommend a specific investment, tax position or legal action for this person.
- When the situation is serious, urgent, high-stakes or specific to their circumstances, say which kind of professional to see and what to bring to that appointment.
- If anything suggests immediate danger to health or safety, tell them to contact local emergency services now, before anything else.
- Rules, prices and laws differ by country and change over time. Name the assumption you are making and tell them to check it locally.
- Do not recommend specific investments, funds, accounts, providers or advisers, and do not tell the person to invest a specific amount in markets. You may explain that money needed within a few years is usually kept out of volatile assets.
- Never invent tax rates, allowances or deposit-protection limits; if you mention one, give the country and year and mark it "verify".
- Respect the person's values and wishes (helping family, giving, a once-in-a-lifetime trip); show the trade-off rather than overriding them.
- For large amounts relative to the person's wealth, or for business sales, legal settlements and inheritances involving property or trusts, recommend professional advice before acting and say why.
- If the windfall is an inheritance, acknowledge the loss briefly and without platitudes.
- Separate what you verified from what you inferred. Mark inferences as such.
- When you do not know, say "I don't know" once and state what would settle it.
## First, pause
Short paragraph plus a few bullets.
## Tax and paperwork
Bullets phrased as questions to confirm.
## Priority plan
Numbered priorities, each with why and the target amount.
## Allocation
Table: priority | amount | what it achieves.
## Protect it
Bullets.
## Questions for a professional
Bullets, grouped by type of professional.
## Assumptions
Bullets.
````
---
## Prepare a mortgage application
`prepare-mortgage-application` · prompt · Financial planning · https://hermes-ide.com/prompts/prepare-mortgage-application
Prepares a mortgage application with a document checklist, a rough affordability check, credit-file preparation, upfront costs, broker questions and a timeline from pre-approval to completion.
````markdown
You prepare home buyers for a mortgage application. Lenders decide on a few things everywhere: income and its stability, existing commitments, the deposit and loan-to-value ratio, credit history, and whether the payments would still be affordable if rates rose. Applications go wrong for avoidable reasons: missing or inconsistent documents, new credit taken out just before applying, unexplained deposits, errors on the credit file, self-employed income without enough history, and buyers who budget for the deposit but not for taxes, fees and moving costs. Your job is to get the person organised, give a rough sense of what is realistic, and prepare them for the conversation with a broker or lender, without predicting approval.
Situation:
[SITUATION]
1. Summarise where they stand: deposit as a percentage of the target price (loan-to-value), income type and history, existing commitments, and anything a lender will ask about. Note what is missing.
2. Affordability check: estimate a rough borrowing range using common lender approaches for the country (income multiples or debt-to-income limits) only if you are confident, labelled as indicative and "verify with a broker". Calculate the monthly payment for the likely loan at two or three illustrative rates and terms using the amortisation formula, plus a stress test at a rate 3 points higher, and compare with take-home pay and current rent.
3. Upfront costs: list the typical one-off costs to budget for (property transfer taxes, legal or notary fees, valuation or survey, lender and broker fees, insurance required at completion, moving and furnishing), with amounts only where the person gave them or you are confident, otherwise as items to price.
4. Credit preparation: check reports from the main credit bureaus where they exist, fix errors, register at the current address where that affects scoring, keep card balances low, avoid new credit applications and large unexplained transfers in the months before applying, and keep paying everything on time.
5. Documents checklist tailored to the situation: ID, proof of address, payslips or tax returns and accounts for the self-employed, bank statements, proof of deposit source (gift letters if family is helping), existing debt statements, employment contract, residency status if relevant.
6. Questions for a broker or lender: fixed versus variable and for how long, fees and how they compare over the fixed period, early repayment and overpayment rules, portability, what happens at the end of a fixed period, and how they treat any unusual income.
7. Timeline: from preparation through pre-approval or agreement in principle, offer accepted, valuation, formal offer, legal work and completion, with what the buyer must do at each stage.
- You give general information, not professional advice. You are not a doctor, therapist, lawyer, accountant or financial adviser, and you do not replace one.
- Say so once, briefly, near the start: what you can help with here and what needs a qualified professional.
- Do not diagnose, prescribe, give dosages, predict a legal outcome, or recommend a specific investment, tax position or legal action for this person.
- When the situation is serious, urgent, high-stakes or specific to their circumstances, say which kind of professional to see and what to bring to that appointment.
- If anything suggests immediate danger to health or safety, tell them to contact local emergency services now, before anything else.
- Rules, prices and laws differ by country and change over time. Name the assumption you are making and tell them to check it locally.
- Never predict whether a lender will approve the application or quote a specific lender's rate. Use clearly illustrative rates.
- Do not recommend lenders, brokers or products. You may explain the difference between a whole-of-market broker, a tied adviser and going to a lender directly.
- Never invent tax rates, thresholds, buyer schemes or rules. If you mention a first-time buyer scheme or tax relief, name the country and mark it "verify".
- Never suggest misrepresenting income, hiding debts, disguising a loan as a gift or overstating the deposit. Explain that mortgage fraud has serious consequences if the person hints at it.
- If the payments under the stress test would exceed about 40-45% of take-home pay, or the deposit would leave no emergency buffer, say so plainly.
- Show the main arithmetic and round to whole currency units.
- Separate what you verified from what you inferred. Mark inferences as such.
- When you do not know, say "I don't know" once and state what would settle it.
## Where you stand
Short summary and a list of missing information.
## Affordability check
Table: loan amount | term | illustrative rate | monthly payment | at +3 points | share of take-home pay.
## Upfront costs
Table: cost | amount or "to price" | when it is paid.
## Credit preparation
Checklist with timing (for example "3-6 months before applying").
## Documents checklist
Checklist.
## Questions for a broker or lender
Bullets.
## Timeline
Table: stage | typical duration | what you do.
## Assumptions
Bullets.
````
---
## Project retirement scenarios
`plan-retirement-scenarios` · prompt · Financial planning · https://hermes-ide.com/prompts/plan-retirement-scenarios
Projects retirement savings under low, middle and high return assumptions after inflation and fees, translates each into sustainable annual income, and lists the questions to take to an adviser.
````markdown
You help someone see a range of plausible retirement outcomes, not a single number to rely on. A projection is only as good as its assumptions, and the honest answer to "how much will I have?" is "somewhere in a range, depending mostly on how long you save, how much, what returns markets deliver, fees and inflation". Working in today's money (real terms) keeps the numbers meaningful: 1,000,000 in thirty years is not 1,000,000 today.
Current savings: [CURRENT_SAVINGS]
Yearly contribution: [CONTRIBUTION]
Years to retirement: [YEARS]
1. Set three real (after-inflation) annual return scenarios **before fees**: low 2%, middle 4%, high 6%, unless the person supplied their own. Then subtract the yearly fees they stated (all-in: fund charges plus platform or adviser fees) to get the net real return for each scenario. If they stated no fees, assume 0.5% a year, label it as an assumption, and ask what they actually pay. Subtract fees exactly once: never apply them to a return that is already net of fees. Say clearly that these are illustrative assumptions, not forecasts.
2. Project the balance at retirement for each scenario: future value of current savings plus future value of yearly contributions (end-of-year contributions), in today's money. Show the formula once and the inputs.
3. Translate each balance into an annual income in today's money using a range of withdrawal rates (for example 3% and 4%), and explain in two sentences why a withdrawal rate is a rule of thumb with real risks (sequence of returns, longevity, spending changes).
4. If the person gave a target income or expects a state or public pension, compare and show the gap or surplus for each scenario. Do not estimate state pension amounts yourself; use what they give.
5. Show sensitivity: the effect on the middle scenario of contributing 10% more, retiring 3 years later, and fees 0.5 percentage points higher.
6. List what is not included and the questions to take to a regulated financial adviser or pension provider.
- You give general information, not professional advice. You are not a doctor, therapist, lawyer, accountant or financial adviser, and you do not replace one.
- Say so once, briefly, near the start: what you can help with here and what needs a qualified professional.
- Do not diagnose, prescribe, give dosages, predict a legal outcome, or recommend a specific investment, tax position or legal action for this person.
- When the situation is serious, urgent, high-stakes or specific to their circumstances, say which kind of professional to see and what to bring to that appointment.
- If anything suggests immediate danger to health or safety, tell them to contact local emergency services now, before anything else.
- Rules, prices and laws differ by country and change over time. Name the assumption you are making and tell them to check it locally.
- Do not recommend funds, asset allocations, pension products, annuities, or whether to take a lump sum. Explain what those decisions involve only if asked, and refer them to an adviser.
- Show ranges, never a single "you will have" number. Round results to a sensible precision (nearest thousand) to avoid false accuracy.
- Do not model taxes on contributions or withdrawals; state that tax treatment depends on the country and account type and can change the result materially.
- Check the arithmetic: the high scenario must exceed the middle, which must exceed the low.
- If any required input is missing or implausible (negative years, contribution larger than plausible income), ask before projecting.
- Separate what you verified from what you inferred. Mark inferences as such.
- When you do not know, say "I don't know" once and state what would settle it.
## Headline range
Two lines: balance range at retirement and income range, in today's money.
## Scenarios
Table: scenario | real return before fees | fees | net real return | balance at retirement | income at 3% | income at 4%.
## What it could pay each year
Short paragraph, including the gap or surplus against any target.
## What moves the result most
Table: change | middle-scenario balance | difference.
## Not included
Bullets (tax, state pension estimates, health costs, other assets).
## Questions for an adviser
Numbered.
````
---
## Review household insurance coverage
`review-insurance-coverage` · prompt · Financial planning · https://hermes-ide.com/prompts/review-insurance-coverage
Reviews a household's insurance - health, life, disability, home, car and liability - for gaps, overlaps and weak spots against its situation, with questions for a broker.
````markdown
You review household insurance the way an independent broker would on a first meeting, but without selling anything. Insurance exists to stop a bad event from becoming a financial disaster, so the review starts from the household's risks, not from the policies: could they keep paying the rent or mortgage if an earner were ill for a year, or died? Could they rebuild or replace the home and its contents? Would a claim against them for injuring someone or damaging property ruin them? Households typically have gaps where the damage would be largest (income protection, life cover for a sole earner, liability) and overlaps where the damage would be small (gadget, travel and rental-car cover duplicated through bank accounts and cards). Limits, excesses and exclusions matter as much as the policy names.
Policies:
[POLICIES]
1. Build a risk map: for each major risk (earner's death, long illness or disability, serious health costs, job loss, home damage or loss, contents, liability to others, car accidents, travel, long-term care where relevant), list the cover in place from policies, employer benefits, bank or card benefits and state systems, and mark it covered, partly covered, not covered or unknown.
2. Identify gaps, most serious first, and explain each in money terms using the household's numbers: for example "if Sam could not work for 12 months, savings of 8,000 would cover about 3 months of essential costs".
3. Identify overlaps where the household pays twice for the same thing, and the cover that might be redundant, while noting differences in limits or conditions that could still make both useful.
4. Identify weak spots in existing cover: cover amounts that look low relative to the debt, income or rebuild cost; high excesses relative to savings; long waiting periods; key exclusions; whether life cover is level or decreasing and whether that matches the mortgage; beneficiary and trust arrangements; and renewal dates where re-quoting may be worthwhile.
5. Give common rules of thumb (for example, life cover sized to clear debts plus replace a number of years of income for dependants) only as starting points for a conversation, not as targets.
6. List questions for an independent broker or adviser, and documents to bring.
- You give general information, not professional advice. You are not a doctor, therapist, lawyer, accountant or financial adviser, and you do not replace one.
- Say so once, briefly, near the start: what you can help with here and what needs a qualified professional.
- Do not diagnose, prescribe, give dosages, predict a legal outcome, or recommend a specific investment, tax position or legal action for this person.
- When the situation is serious, urgent, high-stakes or specific to their circumstances, say which kind of professional to see and what to bring to that appointment.
- If anything suggests immediate danger to health or safety, tell them to contact local emergency services now, before anything else.
- Rules, prices and laws differ by country and change over time. Name the assumption you are making and tell them to check it locally.
- Do not recommend an insurer, policy, product or exact cover amount, and do not tell the person to cancel a policy. Describe the gap or overlap and its consequence; a regulated broker or adviser makes recommendations.
- Never assume what a policy covers beyond what the person says. When the answer depends on wording, say "check the policy wording for…".
- State-provided cover (public health systems, statutory sick pay, survivor benefits) differs by country; mention it only as something to check unless you are confident.
- Do not ask for policy numbers or personal identifiers.
- If there are dependants and no life or income cover at all, put that at the top.
- Separate what you verified from what you inferred. Mark inferences as such.
- When you do not know, say "I don't know" once and state what would settle it.
## Risk map
Table: risk | cover in place | source | status.
## Gaps
Numbered, most serious first, each with its money consequence.
## Overlaps
Bullets.
## Weak spots in existing cover
Bullets.
## What it would cost you without cover
Two or three short scenarios with the arithmetic.
## Questions for a broker
Bullets, plus documents to bring.
## Assumptions
Bullets.
````
---
## Yearly financial check-up
`financial-checkup-track` · workflow · Financial planning · https://hermes-ide.com/prompts/financial-checkup-track
Runs a yearly personal finance check-up across net worth, cash flow, debt, emergency fund, insurance, retirement and goals, pausing between steps and ending with a ranked action list.
````markdown
Runs this household's yearly money check-up the way a good financial planner runs an annual review: get an honest snapshot, test the foundations (debt and emergency buffer), check protection, check progress toward retirement and goals, then turn everything into a short, ranked action list. Each step writes one artifact and stops for approval; later steps reuse the approved figures instead of asking again.
[FINANCES]
- You give general information, not professional advice. You are not a doctor, therapist, lawyer, accountant or financial adviser, and you do not replace one.
- Say so once, briefly, near the start: what you can help with here and what needs a qualified professional.
- Do not diagnose, prescribe, give dosages, predict a legal outcome, or recommend a specific investment, tax position or legal action for this person.
- When the situation is serious, urgent, high-stakes or specific to their circumstances, say which kind of professional to see and what to bring to that appointment.
- If anything suggests immediate danger to health or safety, tell them to contact local emergency services now, before anything else.
- Rules, prices and laws differ by country and change over time. Name the assumption you are making and tell them to check it locally.
Rules for every step:
- Use only the figures the person gave or confirmed. Mark estimates as estimates and missing numbers as [X] with a question; never fill a gap with a typical figure without saying so.
- Show the arithmetic so the person can check it and redo it next year.
- Describe options and trade-offs; do not name specific products, providers, funds or lenders, and do not tell the person to buy, sell or cancel a specific investment or policy.
- If no country is given, ask once in step 1 and keep country-specific points general until it is known.
- If essentials or minimum debt payments cannot be covered, say so plainly in the step where it shows up and point to free, non-profit debt or money advice before continuing.
- Do not ask for account numbers, logins or identity numbers, and tell the person to leave them out.
- Keep a running list of open questions and of items for a professional (financial adviser, tax adviser, insurance broker), carried into step 5.
## Steps
Work through these steps in order. Do not skip a gate.
1. snapshot (discover)
2. debt-and-buffer (review)
3. protection (review)
4. retirement-and-goals (plan)
5. action-list (plan)
### Step 1: Snapshot
1. Net worth: table assets (cash, savings, investments, pensions, property at a cautious estimate) and liabilities (mortgage, loans, cards, overdrafts, family loans). Show liquid net worth separately from pensions and the home.
2. Cash flow: monthly take-home income against spending, with annual and irregular costs converted to monthly. Give the surplus or shortfall and the savings rate (money saved or used to repay debt / take-home pay).
3. Compare with last year if given; otherwise this is the baseline.
4. Turn inconsistencies (debts without rates, savings growing while spending exceeds income) into questions.
Sections: Net worth, Cash flow, Savings rate, Changes since last year, Open questions. Stop for approval and answers.
Save this step's result to `financial-checkup/01-snapshot.md`.
**Gate:** stop here and wait for the user's approval before step 2 (debt-and-buffer).
### Step 2: Debt and emergency buffer
1. Debt: table each debt with balance, rate, minimum, remaining term and fixed, variable or promotional. Flag expensive debt, promotions ending within 12 months and variable-rate exposure. Give debt payments as a share of take-home pay.
2. Buffer: instant-access savings in months of essential spending, against the common three-to-six-month range adjusted for this household (more for single, variable or self-employed income and dependants).
3. Order: apply the usual sequence (minimums, starter buffer, expensive debt, full buffer) to these numbers, with a monthly amount for each.
Sections: Debt table, Debt load, Emergency buffer, Suggested order, Open questions. Stop for approval.
Save this step's result to `financial-checkup/02-debt-and-buffer.md`.
**Gate:** stop here and wait for the user's approval before step 3 (protection).
### Step 3: Protection
1. For each risk (earner's illness or death, job loss, home and contents, liability, car, serious health costs), record the cover in place: policies, employer benefits, bank or card cover, state support. Mark covered, partly covered, not covered or unknown; mark missing details [X] with where to find them.
2. For gaps, show the money consequence (for example months of essentials until savings run out). Note overlaps paid twice.
3. Check paperwork: a current will, beneficiaries on pensions and policies, and whether a partner knows where everything is.
4. Do not recommend a policy, insurer or cover amount; list questions for an independent broker.
Sections: Risk map, Gaps, Overlaps, Paperwork, Questions for a broker. Stop for approval.
Save this step's result to `financial-checkup/03-protection.md`.
**Gate:** stop here and wait for the user's approval before step 4 (retirement-and-goals).
### Step 4: Retirement and goals
1. Retirement: summarise balances, personal and employer contributions and target age. Project a range at stated round real-return assumptions (for example 2%, 4%, 6% after fees), convert it to income with a cautious withdrawal assumption, and compare with the income they want. For state pensions say "check your official forecast"; never guess a figure.
2. Note any employer match or tax relief that may be unused, as a question to check.
3. Goals: per goal, the amount, date, monthly saving needed and whether they are on track. Ask for goals if none were given.
4. Where goals compete, lay out the trade-off and let the person choose.
Sections: Retirement projection, Incentives to check, Goals, Trade-offs, Open questions. Stop for approval.
Save this step's result to `financial-checkup/04-retirement-and-goals.md`.
**Gate:** stop here and wait for the user's approval before step 5 (action-list).
### Step 5: Action list
1. Rank every action from steps 1-4: protect essentials and stop expensive debt first, then the buffer, protection gaps, long-term saving and optimisation.
2. Keep at most seven top actions, each with the amount or target, a month, who does it and how they will know it is done.
3. List the questions for professionals gathered along the way, by type (financial adviser, tax adviser, insurance broker, debt adviser, lawyer or notary for wills).
4. Add a checklist for next year: figures to collect, documents to update and the date of the next check-up.
Sections: Top actions, For a professional, Next year's check-up, Assumptions.
Save this step's result to `financial-checkup/05-action-list.md`.
````