hermes

Write a research interview protocol

Writes a semi-structured research interview protocol with a consent script, question themes, probes, timing and reflexivity notes, tied to the research question. For qualitative researchers.

context

A semi-structured interview protocol keeps interviews comparable without turning them into a spoken questionnaire. Good guides translate the research question into a few broad themes, ask open, non-leading questions that invite stories about concrete experiences ("Tell me about the last time…"), and rely on probes to go deeper. They start easy and move to sensitive topics once rapport exists, leave room for what the participant raises, and fit the time. The research question itself is never asked directly. Ethics is part of the protocol: consent is an ongoing conversation, participants can skip questions or stop, and the interviewer knows what to do if someone becomes distressed or discloses risk. Reflexivity notes record how the interviewer's own position may shape what is said and heard.

task

Write an interview protocol for a -minute interview.

research question

Only if [PARTICIPANTS] is given:

participants

  1. Turn the research question into three to five interview themes, and show which part of the question each theme serves.
  2. For each theme, write one or two main open questions and three to five probes: detail ("Can you walk me through that?"), example ("What happened the last time?"), meaning ("What did that mean for you?"), contrast, and clarification. Avoid leading, double-barrelled and yes or no questions, and jargon the participants would not use.
  3. Order the themes from easy and descriptive to reflective and sensitive, and give each a time allocation that adds up to minutes with five to ten minutes for opening and closing.
  4. Write the opening script: thanks, purpose in plain language, recording and how data will be stored and anonymised, voluntary participation, the right to skip questions, pause or withdraw, and confirming consent on the recording. Mark where study-specific details from the approved ethics documents must be inserted.
  5. Write the closing: an open "anything we have not covered?" question, a short debrief, next steps, and where to get support if the topic is sensitive.
  6. Add practical notes for interviews (connection or recording checks, privacy of the participant's location, a backup plan).
  7. Write a distress and disclosure procedure the interviewer can use mid-interview: signs to watch for, the words to offer a pause, skip or stop, when to end the interview and not resume, what to do if a participant discloses a risk of harm to themselves or others (follow the study's approved safeguarding and referral procedures, within the limits of confidentiality stated at consent), and placeholders for local support contacts.
  8. Write reflexivity prompts for the interviewer to answer before and after each interview.
  9. List what to check in a pilot interview.
constraints
  • Questions must be open and neutral. Rewrite any that presume an answer.
  • Do not invent ethics approval numbers, data-protection details or support-service contacts. Use placeholders such as [ETHICS REF] and [LOCAL SUPPORT CONTACT].
  • Keep the number of main questions realistic for the time: roughly one main question per five to eight minutes of interview.
  • If the participants are a vulnerable group (children, people in crisis, patients, people in a dependent relationship with the researcher), add the extra safeguards this needs and flag that the ethics committee must approve the protocol.
  • If the research question is not suited to interviews (for example it asks for prevalence or effect sizes), say so and suggest a better method before writing the guide.
output format

Protocol overview

Research question, approach, participants, mode, duration, themes with the part of the question each serves.

Before the interview

Checklist.

Opening and consent

Script, with placeholders in square brackets.

Interview guide

For each theme: a heading with minutes, main question(s) in bold, probes as bullets.

Distress and disclosure procedure

Numbered steps the interviewer can follow during the interview, with example wording and placeholders for contacts.

Closing

Script.

After the interview

Field notes template and data-handling steps.

Reflexivity notes

Prompts before and after.

Pilot checklist

Bullets.

1 required value still a placeholder; the assistant will ask for it.

details

kind
Prompt: a task you run by name to get one finished thing back
domain
Research and science
category
Research methods
level
Intermediate
made for
Researcher / scientist, Student, UX researcher
risk
read-only
version
v1.1.0 · incubating
reviewed
2026-10-02
works in
Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Antigravity, OpenCode, Windsurf, Zed, Continue, AGENTS.md, ChatGPT, claude.ai

Edit on GitHubReport a problem

use in

Hodios CLI
npx @hermes-hq/hodios install write-research-interview-protocol --target claude-code
Agent Skills
npx skills add hermes-hq/hodios-dist --skill write-research-interview-protocol -a claude-code
Add the Hodios marketplace (once)
claude plugin marketplace add hermes-hq/hodios-dist
Install the research-science plugin
claude plugin install hodios-research-science@hodios

The plugin brings every entry in this domain at once.

PromptResearch methods

Run a reflexive thematic analysis

Runs reflexive thematic analysis on qualitative data through familiarisation, initial codes, candidate themes with quotes, review and definitions. For qualitative researchers.

run-thematic-analysis
PromptResearch methods

Build a qualitative codebook

Builds a codebook and coding procedure for qualitative data, with definitions, inclusion and exclusion rules, verbatim examples and an inter-rater check. Use before coding interviews or open text.

build-qualitative-codebook
PromptResearch methods

Draft a research ethics application

Drafts a research ethics (IRB) application covering risks and benefits, consent, data protection, vulnerable groups and mitigation, mapped to the committee's form. For researchers working with people.

write-ethics-application
PersonaResearch methods

Research methodologist

Research methodologist who probes study designs for validity threats, matches methods to questions and asks what evidence would change the conclusion. Use as a sparring partner for any study.

research-methodologist
PromptResearch methods

Design a research study

Designs a study from a research question to hypotheses, design, variables, sampling and sample size, a pre-specified analysis plan and threats to validity. Use before collecting any data.

design-research-study
PromptResearch methods

Write a survey questionnaire

Writes an unbiased questionnaire for a stated research aim, with construct mapping, appropriate response scales, skip logic and a pilot checklist. Use before fielding any survey.

write-survey-questionnaire