hermes

Explain research to the public

Turns a research paper into an accurate plain-language summary, press release, blog post or social thread without hype, keeping caveats, study type and effect sizes. Use for science communication.

context

Studies of science news have traced much of the exaggeration in health and science coverage back to the press releases themselves: correlations reported as causes, animal results applied to humans, and advice the study never tested. Readers understand risk better as absolute numbers and natural frequencies ("8 in 100 people instead of 10 in 100") than as relative changes ("a 20% drop"). Good public writing is accurate first and engaging second: it says what was studied, in whom, what was found and how sure we can be, in words a curious 14-year-old could follow.

task

Write a about this paper for a general audience:

paper

  1. Before writing, extract: the question, the study type, who or what was studied (humans, animals, cells, models) and how many, the main finding with its numbers, the main limitations, and whether the paper is peer-reviewed or a preprint.
  2. Lead with what was found, in plain words, with the study type and population in the same sentence or the next.
  3. Give the size of the effect in absolute terms or natural frequencies when the paper provides the numbers; if it only reports relative figures, say so rather than converting them yourself.
  4. Keep the caveats in the body, not in a final line: what the study cannot show, and what would need to happen next.
  5. Shape it for the format:
  • summary: 150 to 250 words.
  • press-release: headline, subheading, "[CITY, DATE]" dateline placeholder, about 400 to 500 words, a "[QUOTE FROM RESEARCHER: …]" placeholder describing what the quote should cover, and Notes to editors with the citation and study details.
  • blog: 600 to 900 words with a headline and short subheadings.
  • social: a thread of 3 to 5 posts of at most 280 characters each, where the first post already carries the main caveat.
constraints
  • Use only the paper. Do not add facts, statistics or context from memory; if background is needed, mark it "[BACKGROUND: …]" for the author to source.
  • Match claims to the design: associations stay associations, animal and cell findings are labelled as such, and models and simulations are called predictions.
  • Avoid hype words such as "breakthrough", "cure", "miracle", "game-changer" and "proves", and headlines that the body has to walk back.
  • Never invent quotes. Use the quote placeholder.
  • Do not tell readers to change their health, diet, medicines or money based on one study. When the topic touches health, add one sentence that they should talk to a doctor or other qualified professional before acting on it.
  • If the paper text is missing or too thin to report the finding accurately, say what is needed instead of writing.
output format

The piece in the requested format, then:

Accuracy check

A table: claim in the piece | the sentence or number in the paper that supports it. Add a row for every number used.

1 required value still a placeholder; the assistant will ask for it.

details

kind
Prompt: a task you run by name to get one finished thing back
domain
Research and science
category
Scientific writing
level
Intermediate
made for
Researcher / scientist, Writer / author, Content creator
risk
read-only
version
v1.0.0 · experimental
reviewed
2026-10-02
works in
Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Antigravity, OpenCode, Windsurf, Zed, Continue, AGENTS.md, ChatGPT, claude.ai

Edit on GitHubReport a problem

use in

Hodios CLI
npx @hermes-hq/hodios install explain-research-to-public --target claude-code
Agent Skills
npx skills add hermes-hq/hodios-dist --skill explain-research-to-public -a claude-code
Add the Hodios marketplace (once)
claude plugin marketplace add hermes-hq/hodios-dist
Install the research-science plugin
claude plugin install hodios-research-science@hodios

The plugin brings every entry in this domain at once.

PromptLiterature review

Summarise a research paper

Summarises a research paper into its question, method, key results with exact numbers, limitations and what it means for the reader's purpose. Use before citing, relying on or reading a paper in full.

summarize-paper
PromptScientific writing

Write a paper abstract

Writes a structured or unstructured abstract within a word limit from a manuscript, keeping every number faithful to the source and showing where each appears. Use before submission.

write-abstract
PromptScientific writing

Respond to peer reviewers

Drafts a point-by-point response to peer-review comments, giving the change made or a polite, evidenced rebuttal for each, never claiming unmade changes. Use for revise-and-resubmit.

respond-to-reviewers
PromptScientific writing

Write a research proposal

Writes a research or grant proposal section (aims, significance, approach, timeline) mapped to the funder's criteria, with placeholders instead of invented data. Use for grant or thesis proposals.

write-research-proposal
RuleScientific writing

Academic writing rules

Standing rules for academic writing that hedge claims to the evidence, define terms, forbid invented citations, keep tense and terminology consistent, and report numbers precisely.

academic-writing-rules
PromptScientific writing

Shortlist target journals for a manuscript

Shortlists journals for a manuscript by scope, audience, article type, open-access costs and timelines, ranked in tiers, with facts to verify on each journal's site. For authors before submission.

choose-target-journal