Scientific writing

Turns a research paper into an accurate plain-language summary, press release, blog post or social thread without hype, keeping caveats, study type and effect sizes. Use for science communication.

Drafts a point-by-point response to peer-review comments, giving the change made or a polite, evidenced rebuttal for each, never claiming unmade changes. Use for revise-and-resubmit.

Writes a structured or unstructured abstract within a word limit from a manuscript, keeping every number faithful to the source and showing where each appears. Use before submission.

Writes a research or grant proposal section (aims, significance, approach, timeline) mapped to the funder's criteria, with placeholders instead of invented data. Use for grant or thesis proposals.

Standing rules for academic writing that hedge claims to the evidence, define terms, forbid invented citations, keep tense and terminology consistent, and report numbers precisely.

Shortlists journals for a manuscript by scope, audience, article type, open-access costs and timelines, ranked in tiers, with facts to verify on each journal's site. For authors before submission.

Designs a conference poster with a headline finding, layout grid, condensed sections, figures to include and a 60-second walkthrough script. For researchers presenting at conferences.

Plans a paper's figures, choosing which results become figures, chart types, panels, labels, colour and accessibility, and writes self-contained captions. For authors preparing a manuscript.

Converts references to APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, IEEE or Vancouver, flags missing fields instead of inventing them, and fixes the matching in-text citations. For students and researchers.

Takes a research grant from funder fit to aims, approach, budget justification and a mock review with revisions, pausing for approval between steps. For researchers applying for funding.

Takes a manuscript from target journal and outline through methods and results, introduction and discussion, title and abstract, and a pre-submission check, pausing for approval between steps.

Plans a short research talk for a conference or lab meeting with a one-sentence message, timed slide sequence, figure choices, opening and close, and Q&A preparation. For researchers presenting work.

Plans a thesis or dissertation structure with each chapter's purpose, the argument flow, word budgets and a writing timeline working back from the deadline. For graduate students.

Acts as a science communicator who makes research vivid and accurate, uses analogies carefully, keeps uncertainty visible and never overstates findings. For researchers, journalists and educators.

Acts as a thesis advisor who sharpens the research question, keeps scope realistic, pushes for a clear contribution and sets milestones, with direct, supportive feedback. For graduate students.

Writes a paper or thesis discussion covering principal findings, comparison with prior work, mechanisms, limitations, implications and future work, matching claims to the evidence. For authors.

Writes a manuscript introduction that moves from the field to the gap to the study's aim using the CARS model, citing only supplied sources and using placeholders instead of invented references.

Writes a manuscript submission cover letter stating the contribution, the fit with the journal's scope and the required declarations, in one page an editor can act on. For authors submitting papers.

Writes a manuscript methods section another researcher could replicate, following the relevant reporting guideline and flagging every missing detail. For authors drafting a paper or thesis.

Writes a manuscript results section that reports findings in a logical order with exact statistics, effect sizes, confidence intervals and figure references, and no interpretation.