hermes

Reply to someone sharing misinformation

Helps reply to a friend or relative who shared misinformation, with what is wrong, the core fact, a non-judgemental message and a credible source to share. For people in family group chats.

context

Corrections work best when they come from someone the person trusts, respect their underlying worry, and lead with the accurate information rather than the myth. The "truth sandwich" (fact first, then a brief mention of the myth and why it is misleading, then the fact again) avoids amplifying the false claim. Public mockery, long lectures and piles of links usually entrench the belief and damage the relationship. A private message is usually better than a correction in front of the group, but a short, neutral note in the group can protect others who saw the post. Many people share misinformation out of care ("I wanted you to be safe"), so the reply should honour that.

task

Help me reply about this:

shared

Only if [RELATIONSHIP] is given: Who shared it: Reply channel:

  1. What is wrong: in two or three sentences, what is false or misleading, and the type of problem (made up, real but out of context, old news recirculated, exaggerated, a scam). Note anything in it that is true.
  2. The core fact: the one accurate statement that replaces the myth, in plain words.
  3. Your message: write a short, warm message in my voice, under about 80 words for a chat. Open with connection or shared concern, give the core fact, mention the myth only briefly, and end with an open question or offer rather than a verdict. If channel is group, keep it neutral and brief and suggest also messaging the person privately. Offer a second, even shorter version.
  4. A source to share: suggest one credible, accessible source of the kind this person is likely to trust (a national health service, a well-known fact-checking organisation, a respected local outlet, the original source in context).
  5. If they push back: two or three calm replies for likely responses ("I just shared it in case", "you can't trust them either"), and when to let it go.
constraints
  • Do not invent facts, statistics or links. If you can browse, link only pages you opened. If you cannot, name the organisation and what to search for on its site, and tell me to check the page before sharing it.
  • If you are not sure the claim is false, say so, and write a message that asks questions instead of correcting.
  • Never mock or shame the person, and do not suggest tactics that could humiliate them in the group.
  • If the shared content involves a health risk (for example stopping medicine or a dangerous remedy), make the core fact clear and suggest they talk to their doctor or pharmacist.
  • If the content is a scam (asking for money, codes or personal details), say so first and include a warning not to click or pay.
  • Stay neutral on politics; correct the fact, not the person's views.
output format

Use the contract's section headings. Put the main and short versions of your message in quote blocks. Give the pushback replies as a two-column table: they say | you could reply.

1 required value still a placeholder; the assistant will ask for it.

details

kind
Prompt: a task you run by name to get one finished thing back
domain
Research and science
category
Fact-checking
level
Beginner
made for
Anyone, personal use, Parent / caregiver
risk
read-only
version
v1.0.0 · incubating
reviewed
2026-10-02
works in
Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Antigravity, OpenCode, Windsurf, Zed, Continue, AGENTS.md, ChatGPT, claude.ai

Edit on GitHubReport a problem

use in

Hodios CLI
npx @hermes-hq/hodios install respond-to-misinformation --target claude-code
Agent Skills
npx skills add hermes-hq/hodios-dist --skill respond-to-misinformation -a claude-code
Add the Hodios marketplace (once)
claude plugin marketplace add hermes-hq/hodios-dist
Install the research-science plugin
claude plugin install hodios-research-science@hodios

The plugin brings every entry in this domain at once.

pairs well with

All of Fact-checking
PromptFact-checking

Fact-check claims in a text

Checks each factual claim in a text against sources it actually retrieves, rates it with evidence and links, and says plainly when a claim cannot be verified. Use before publishing or sharing.

fact-check-claims
PromptFact-checking

Check a health or nutrition claim

Checks a health or nutrition claim against the hierarchy of evidence and explains in plain words what the research does and does not show, without personal medical advice. For health news readers.

check-health-claim
PromptFact-checking

Verify where an image or video came from

Guides a check of where an image or video came from through reverse search, metadata, visual clues, earlier versions and signs of AI generation or editing. For journalists and careful sharers.

verify-image-provenance
PromptFact-checking

Check the statistics in an article

Checks an article's numbers for misleading percentages, missing base rates, cherry-picked windows and correlation sold as causation, recomputing what it can. Use before quoting it.

check-statistics-in-article
PromptFact-checking

Evaluate a source's credibility

Assesses how far a source can be trusted for a specific claim using lateral reading (author, evidence, funding, corroboration) and gives a reasoned verdict. Use before citing a source.

evaluate-source-credibility
PromptFact-checking

Check a science news story against the paper

Checks a news story about a study against the paper itself, covering design, sample, effect size, causal language and what the headline overstates, and suggests an accurate headline.

check-science-news-against-paper