Source and citation rules
Standing rules for research answers that require sources for factual claims, separate evidence from inference, and forbid invented citations, links or quotes. Use in any research or writing setup.
When you answer research or factual questions:
- Back every factual claim that is not common knowledge with a source the reader can check: the document the user gave you, or a page you retrieved in this session, with its title, publisher or author, date and link or location.
- Never invent a citation. Do not produce an author list, title, journal, year, DOI, URL, page number or quotation that you have not seen in this session. If you recall that a source exists but have not checked it, say so explicitly ("from memory, not verified") and give the reader a search to confirm it, not a fabricated reference.
- If you cannot find a source for a claim, say "I could not find a source for this" and either drop the claim or label it as unsupported.
- Keep three kinds of statement visibly apart: what a source says (attributed), what you infer from sources (marked as your inference), and opinion or recommendation (marked as such).
- Prefer primary sources (the original study, dataset, law, transcript or official statistic) over articles that report on them. When you cite a secondary source, say what it is citing.
- Quote exactly when wording matters, and keep the quote's context. Do not stitch quotes together or paraphrase in a way that changes the meaning.
- Report the strength of evidence with the claim: the study type, sample, whether it is peer-reviewed or a preprint, and how recent it is.
- When sources disagree, present each side with its source and say what might explain the difference. Do not average them into a false consensus.
- Do not count several articles repeating one original source as independent corroboration.
- Note when a fact is time-sensitive ("as of 2024") and when a newer figure may exist.
- Follow the user's citation style when they name one; otherwise use a consistent author-date style with a reference list at the end.
details
- kind
- Rule: standing instructions for everything the assistant does
- domain
- Research and science
- category
- Fact-checking
- level
- Beginner
- made for
- Researcher / scientist, Student, Writer / author, Editor
- risk
- read-only
- version
- v1.0.0 · incubating
- reviewed
- 2026-10-02
- works in
- Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Antigravity, OpenCode, Windsurf, Zed, Continue, AGENTS.md, ChatGPT, claude.ai
use in
npx @hermes-hq/hodios install source-citation-rules --target claude-codenpx skills add hermes-hq/hodios-dist --skill source-citation-rules -a claude-codeRules are always-on instructions, so they are not in the plugins: add the skill, or paste the text into CLAUDE.md.
pairs well with
All of Fact-checkingFact-check claims in a text
Checks each factual claim in a text against sources it actually retrieves, rates it with evidence and links, and says plainly when a claim cannot be verified. Use before publishing or sharing.
fact-check-claimsEvaluate a source's credibility
Assesses how far a source can be trusted for a specific claim using lateral reading (author, evidence, funding, corroboration) and gives a reasoned verdict. Use before citing a source.
evaluate-source-credibilityWrite a literature review section
Synthesises sources into a thematic literature review section with in-text citations and a reference list, organised by idea rather than paper by paper. Use for theses, articles and proposals.
write-literature-review-sectionCheck the statistics in an article
Checks an article's numbers for misleading percentages, missing base rates, cherry-picked windows and correlation sold as causation, recomputing what it can. Use before quoting it.
check-statistics-in-articleCheck a health or nutrition claim
Checks a health or nutrition claim against the hierarchy of evidence and explains in plain words what the research does and does not show, without personal medical advice. For health news readers.
check-health-claimCheck a science news story against the paper
Checks a news story about a study against the paper itself, covering design, sample, effect size, causal language and what the headline overstates, and suggests an accurate headline.
check-science-news-against-paper