hermes

Write a literature review section

Synthesises sources into a thematic literature review section with in-text citations and a reference list, organised by idea rather than paper by paper. Use for theses, articles and proposals.

context

The most common weakness in literature reviews is the "annotated bibliography": one paragraph per paper, each starting with an author's name. Examiners and reviewers want synthesis: paragraphs organised around ideas, where each topic sentence makes a claim about the literature, several sources are brought together as evidence, agreements and disagreements are explained, and the section builds a path to the gap the research question fills.

task

Write a literature review section of at most words that sets up this research question:

research question

Using only these sources:

sources

  1. Read all sources and group them into three to five themes that matter for the research question (for example findings, mechanisms, methods, populations, debates). A source can serve several themes.
  2. Order the themes so the argument narrows from what is established, to what is contested, to what is missing.
  3. Write each paragraph as: a topic sentence that makes a claim about the literature, evidence from two or more sources where possible, an explanation of why studies agree or differ (design, sample, measures, context), and a sentence linking to the next theme.
  4. Weigh the evidence: signal when support comes from strong designs, small samples or a single study.
  5. End by stating the gap or tension that the research question addresses, grounded in the sources.
  6. Cite in style and build the reference list from the details provided.
constraints
  • Cite only the sources provided, and attribute each claim only to a source whose text supports it. Never add a source from memory.
  • If a citation detail is missing (year, pages, DOI, journal), keep the gap visible as "[missing: year]" rather than guessing it.
  • Do not start paragraphs with author names or "Study X found". Lead with the idea.
  • Report the strength of findings faithfully; do not turn "associated with" into "causes" or one study into "research shows".
  • Stay within the word limit, and write in formal academic prose in the third person unless the sources show the field uses something else.
  • If the sources do not bear on the research question, or are too few to synthesise (fewer than about four), say so first and write the best section possible, marked as a draft.
output format

The section itself, with a short heading and optional theme subheadings, then:

Synthesis map

A table: theme | sources (in-text citations) | the claim the section makes about them.

References

The reference list in style, with "[missing: …]" markers where details were not provided.

Check before submitting

The word count, plus bullets listing every "[missing: …]" marker and any claim that rests on a single source.

2 required values still a placeholder; the assistant will ask for them.

details

kind
Prompt: a task you run by name to get one finished thing back
domain
Research and science
category
Literature review
level
Intermediate
made for
Researcher / scientist, Student
risk
read-only
version
v1.0.0 · experimental
reviewed
2026-10-02
works in
Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Antigravity, OpenCode, Windsurf, Zed, Continue, AGENTS.md, ChatGPT, claude.ai

Edit on GitHubReport a problem

use in

Hodios CLI
npx @hermes-hq/hodios install write-literature-review-section --target claude-code
Agent Skills
npx skills add hermes-hq/hodios-dist --skill write-literature-review-section -a claude-code
Add the Hodios marketplace (once)
claude plugin marketplace add hermes-hq/hodios-dist
Install the research-science plugin
claude plugin install hodios-research-science@hodios

The plugin brings every entry in this domain at once.

PromptLiterature review

Build a literature matrix

Extracts a comparison matrix across several papers (question, design, sample, findings, limitations) with every cell traceable to its source. Use when organising sources for a literature review.

build-literature-matrix
PromptLiterature review

Find research gaps

Identifies gaps, contradictions and open questions across a set of abstracts or notes, ties each to its sources and turns it into a researchable question. Use when scoping a thesis, grant or review.

find-research-gaps
WorkflowLiterature review

Literature review track

Takes a literature review from research question and search strategy through screening, an extraction matrix and a written synthesis, with approval between steps. For students and researchers.

literature-review-track
RuleFact-checking

Source and citation rules

Standing rules for research answers that require sources for factual claims, separate evidence from inference, and forbid invented citations, links or quotes. Use in any research or writing setup.

source-citation-rules
PromptLiterature review

Summarise a research paper

Summarises a research paper into its question, method, key results with exact numbers, limitations and what it means for the reader's purpose. Use before citing, relying on or reading a paper in full.

summarize-paper
PromptLiterature review

Appraise a study's risk of bias

Appraises a study's risk of bias with the tool that fits its design, such as RoB 2, ROBINS-I, CASP or Newcastle-Ottawa, justifying each judgement with quotes. For reviewers and practitioners.

appraise-study-quality