Write a literature review section
Synthesises sources into a thematic literature review section with in-text citations and a reference list, organised by idea rather than paper by paper. Use for theses, articles and proposals.
The most common weakness in literature reviews is the "annotated bibliography": one paragraph per paper, each starting with an author's name. Examiners and reviewers want synthesis: paragraphs organised around ideas, where each topic sentence makes a claim about the literature, several sources are brought together as evidence, agreements and disagreements are explained, and the section builds a path to the gap the research question fills.
Write a literature review section of at most words that sets up this research question:
Using only these sources:
- Read all sources and group them into three to five themes that matter for the research question (for example findings, mechanisms, methods, populations, debates). A source can serve several themes.
- Order the themes so the argument narrows from what is established, to what is contested, to what is missing.
- Write each paragraph as: a topic sentence that makes a claim about the literature, evidence from two or more sources where possible, an explanation of why studies agree or differ (design, sample, measures, context), and a sentence linking to the next theme.
- Weigh the evidence: signal when support comes from strong designs, small samples or a single study.
- End by stating the gap or tension that the research question addresses, grounded in the sources.
- Cite in style and build the reference list from the details provided.
- Cite only the sources provided, and attribute each claim only to a source whose text supports it. Never add a source from memory.
- If a citation detail is missing (year, pages, DOI, journal), keep the gap visible as "[missing: year]" rather than guessing it.
- Do not start paragraphs with author names or "Study X found". Lead with the idea.
- Report the strength of findings faithfully; do not turn "associated with" into "causes" or one study into "research shows".
- Stay within the word limit, and write in formal academic prose in the third person unless the sources show the field uses something else.
- If the sources do not bear on the research question, or are too few to synthesise (fewer than about four), say so first and write the best section possible, marked as a draft.
The section itself, with a short heading and optional theme subheadings, then:
Synthesis map
A table: theme | sources (in-text citations) | the claim the section makes about them.
References
The reference list in style, with "[missing: …]" markers where details were not provided.
Check before submitting
The word count, plus bullets listing every "[missing: …]" marker and any claim that rests on a single source.
2 required values still a placeholder; the assistant will ask for them.
details
- kind
- Prompt: a task you run by name to get one finished thing back
- domain
- Research and science
- category
- Literature review
- level
- Intermediate
- made for
- Researcher / scientist, Student
- risk
- read-only
- version
- v1.0.0 · experimental
- reviewed
- 2026-10-02
- works in
- Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Antigravity, OpenCode, Windsurf, Zed, Continue, AGENTS.md, ChatGPT, claude.ai
use in
npx @hermes-hq/hodios install write-literature-review-section --target claude-codenpx skills add hermes-hq/hodios-dist --skill write-literature-review-section -a claude-codeclaude plugin marketplace add hermes-hq/hodios-distclaude plugin install hodios-research-science@hodiosThe plugin brings every entry in this domain at once.
pairs well with
All of Literature reviewBuild a literature matrix
Extracts a comparison matrix across several papers (question, design, sample, findings, limitations) with every cell traceable to its source. Use when organising sources for a literature review.
build-literature-matrixFind research gaps
Identifies gaps, contradictions and open questions across a set of abstracts or notes, ties each to its sources and turns it into a researchable question. Use when scoping a thesis, grant or review.
find-research-gapsLiterature review track
Takes a literature review from research question and search strategy through screening, an extraction matrix and a written synthesis, with approval between steps. For students and researchers.
literature-review-trackSource and citation rules
Standing rules for research answers that require sources for factual claims, separate evidence from inference, and forbid invented citations, links or quotes. Use in any research or writing setup.
source-citation-rulesSummarise a research paper
Summarises a research paper into its question, method, key results with exact numbers, limitations and what it means for the reader's purpose. Use before citing, relying on or reading a paper in full.
summarize-paperAppraise a study's risk of bias
Appraises a study's risk of bias with the tool that fits its design, such as RoB 2, ROBINS-I, CASP or Newcastle-Ottawa, justifying each judgement with quotes. For reviewers and practitioners.
appraise-study-quality