Trace a quote to its origin
Traces a quotation to its original source and context, checks for misattribution and paraphrase drift, and reports confidence with the full source trail. For writers, editors and researchers.
Famous quotes drift. Words get polished, paraphrases become quotations, a line from a character is attributed to the author, a lesser-known person's words migrate to a famous name, and an apocryphal line is repeated on so many sites that it looks established. Quote researchers work backwards in time: they look for the earliest dated appearance in print or recording, compare its wording and context with the modern version, and check whether the attributed person could have said it. Quote-aggregator sites and social posts are not evidence; specialist sources such as Quote Investigator and the "disputed" and "misattributed" sections of Wikiquote are useful leads but should be followed to the primary sources they cite.
Trace this quoteOnly if [ATTRIBUTED_TO] is given: , attributed to :
- Search for the exact wording and for key distinctive phrases, since wording often changes. Search the attributed person's works, speeches, letters and interviews; digitised books and newspaper archives with date limits to find the earliest appearances; and specialist quote research.
- Build a source trail from earliest to latest: each appearance with its date, the exact wording, who it is attributed to there, and a link to the page you opened.
- Compare the earliest version with the modern one: changes in wording, meaning, speaker (for example a character in a novel, an interviewer, or someone the person was quoting) and context (sarcasm, a longer passage that changes the sense).
- Give a verdict:
- Verified: found in a primary source by the person, with matching wording.
- Paraphrase: the idea is theirs but the popular wording is not.
- Misattributed: an earlier or primary source shows someone else said it.
- Apocryphal or unverified: no evidence they said it; earliest appearances are late and unsourced.
- Out of context: genuine, but the context changes what it means. State the confidence and the main evidence.
- Show how to cite it accurately: the original wording and source, or how to attribute it honestly if it cannot be verified ("often attributed to…").
- Cite only pages you opened in this session, with URL and date where available. Never cite from memory or construct a URL, and never invent a book, page number or speech.
- If you have no web access, say so at the top, give no verdict, and instead list the searches and sources the user should check, with what to look for.
- Treat absence of evidence carefully: "I found no evidence that X said this" is not the same as "X never said it". Say how thorough your search was.
- Quote the original exactly, including punctuation and any non-English original, with a translation if needed.
- Do not treat repetition across quote sites as corroboration.
Verdict
The rating in bold, then two or three sentences with the key evidence and confidence.
Source trail
Table: date | source (linked) | exact wording | attributed to.
Original wording and context
The original passage and what it meant in context.
How to cite it
A suggested citation or attribution line.
1 required value still a placeholder; the assistant will ask for it.
details
- kind
- Prompt: a task you run by name to get one finished thing back
- domain
- Research and science
- category
- Fact-checking
- level
- Beginner
- made for
- Writer / author, Editor, Researcher / scientist, Content creator
- needs
- web
- risk
- network
- version
- v1.0.0 · incubating
- reviewed
- 2026-10-02
- works in
- Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Antigravity, OpenCode, Windsurf, Zed, Continue, AGENTS.md, ChatGPT, claude.ai
use in
npx @hermes-hq/hodios install trace-quote-origin --target claude-codenpx skills add hermes-hq/hodios-dist --skill trace-quote-origin -a claude-codeclaude plugin marketplace add hermes-hq/hodios-distclaude plugin install hodios-research-science@hodiosThe plugin brings every entry in this domain at once.
pairs well with
All of Fact-checkingFact-check claims in a text
Checks each factual claim in a text against sources it actually retrieves, rates it with evidence and links, and says plainly when a claim cannot be verified. Use before publishing or sharing.
fact-check-claimsEvaluate a source's credibility
Assesses how far a source can be trusted for a specific claim using lateral reading (author, evidence, funding, corroboration) and gives a reasoned verdict. Use before citing a source.
evaluate-source-credibilitySource and citation rules
Standing rules for research answers that require sources for factual claims, separate evidence from inference, and forbid invented citations, links or quotes. Use in any research or writing setup.
source-citation-rulesCheck the statistics in an article
Checks an article's numbers for misleading percentages, missing base rates, cherry-picked windows and correlation sold as causation, recomputing what it can. Use before quoting it.
check-statistics-in-articleCheck a health or nutrition claim
Checks a health or nutrition claim against the hierarchy of evidence and explains in plain words what the research does and does not show, without personal medical advice. For health news readers.
check-health-claimCheck a science news story against the paper
Checks a news story about a study against the paper itself, covering design, sample, effect size, causal language and what the headline overstates, and suggests an accurate headline.
check-science-news-against-paper