hermes

Write an annotated bibliography

Writes an annotated bibliography with a summary, evaluation and relevance note per source in the chosen citation style, flagging missing details instead of inventing them. For students.

context

An annotated bibliography shows that the writer has read and judged each source, not just found it. Each annotation does three jobs: it summarises the source's argument, method and main findings; it evaluates the source's authority, evidence and limits; and it explains how the source serves the writer's question, including how it relates to the other sources. Weak annotations restate the abstract, praise every source and never say why it matters. Citation details must be accurate; an invented page range or DOI is worse than a visible gap.

task

Write an annotated bibliography in style for this topic:

topic

sources

  1. Format each citation in from the details given. Wherever a required element is missing (authors, year, title, journal, volume, issue, pages, DOI or URL, publisher), insert a visible marker such as [missing: issue number] and list it under Missing details.
  2. For each source, write an annotation of about 120–180 words (or the length the user's assignment sets) in three parts:
  • Summary: the question or argument, the type of source and method, and the main findings or claims, from the material given.
  • Evaluation: the author's expertise or the venue as far as the material shows, the strength and limits of the evidence, currency, and any bias or conflict of interest stated.
  • Relevance: how it answers or complicates the topic, what part of the user's paper it could support, and how it agrees or disagrees with other sources in this list.
  1. Order entries alphabetically by first author unless the style or user asks otherwise.
  2. After the list, note gaps in the set as a whole: perspectives, methods, time periods or kinds of evidence that are missing for this topic.
constraints
  • Use only what the user provides about each source. If you only have a citation and no content, write the citation and say that an annotation needs the abstract or text; do not summarise from memory.
  • Never invent DOIs, page numbers, issue numbers or URLs.
  • Apply the citation style's rules for author names, capitalisation, italics and punctuation consistently. If the style edition matters (for example APA 7 versus APA 6), use the latest edition unless told otherwise and say which.
  • Keep the evaluation fair: name real strengths as well as limits.
  • Write in the third person and in the user's academic register, not in marketing language.
output format

Annotated bibliography

For each source: the formatted citation on its own line (apply the hanging indent when you paste it into your document), then the annotation as one paragraph or three short labelled paragraphs if the user asked for labels.

Missing details

Table: source | missing element | where to find it.

Gaps in the set

Two to five bullets.

2 required values still a placeholder; the assistant will ask for them.

details

kind
Prompt: a task you run by name to get one finished thing back
domain
Research and science
category
Literature review
level
Beginner
made for
Student, Researcher / scientist
risk
read-only
version
v1.0.0 · incubating
reviewed
2026-10-02
works in
Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Antigravity, OpenCode, Windsurf, Zed, Continue, AGENTS.md, ChatGPT, claude.ai

Edit on GitHubReport a problem

use in

Hodios CLI
npx @hermes-hq/hodios install write-annotated-bibliography --target claude-code
Agent Skills
npx skills add hermes-hq/hodios-dist --skill write-annotated-bibliography -a claude-code
Add the Hodios marketplace (once)
claude plugin marketplace add hermes-hq/hodios-dist
Install the research-science plugin
claude plugin install hodios-research-science@hodios

The plugin brings every entry in this domain at once.

PromptScientific writing

Format citations in a reference style

Converts references to APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, IEEE or Vancouver, flags missing fields instead of inventing them, and fixes the matching in-text citations. For students and researchers.

format-citations
PromptLiterature review

Summarise a research paper

Summarises a research paper into its question, method, key results with exact numbers, limitations and what it means for the reader's purpose. Use before citing, relying on or reading a paper in full.

summarize-paper
PromptLiterature review

Build a literature matrix

Extracts a comparison matrix across several papers (question, design, sample, findings, limitations) with every cell traceable to its source. Use when organising sources for a literature review.

build-literature-matrix
RuleFact-checking

Source and citation rules

Standing rules for research answers that require sources for factual claims, separate evidence from inference, and forbid invented citations, links or quotes. Use in any research or writing setup.

source-citation-rules
PromptLiterature review

Find research gaps

Identifies gaps, contradictions and open questions across a set of abstracts or notes, ties each to its sources and turns it into a researchable question. Use when scoping a thesis, grant or review.

find-research-gaps
PromptLiterature review

Write a literature review section

Synthesises sources into a thematic literature review section with in-text citations and a reference list, organised by idea rather than paper by paper. Use for theses, articles and proposals.

write-literature-review-section