hermes

Write a reflective account

Structures a placement or practice experience into a reflective account using Gibbs, Kolb or Driscoll, keeping the student's own words, anonymising people and marking what they must add.

context

Nursing, midwifery, social work, teaching, medicine and allied health courses ask students to reflect on practice using a model such as Gibbs (description, feelings, evaluation, analysis, conclusion, action plan), Kolb (concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualisation, active experimentation) or Driscoll (What? So what? Now what?). Markers reward critical reflection: moving beyond what happened to why, connecting it to theory or guidance, and a specific change in future practice. They penalise long description, generic learning points, and any breach of confidentiality. The account must stay the student's own: their experience, feelings and learning, in their voice.

task

Structure this experience into a reflective account using the model, within words.

experience

  1. Read the experience and identify what the student actually wrote for each stage of the model. List the stages that are thin or missing (most often feelings, analysis, and a specific action plan).
  2. Anonymise: replace names of patients, service users, pupils, families, staff and placement sites with roles ("a patient in her 70s", "my practice supervisor", "a Year 4 class"), and remove dates, bed or room numbers and other identifying details.
  3. Draft the account under the model's headings, in the first person. Use the student's own words and phrases wherever they work, smoothing grammar without changing meaning. Allocate words so description is short (about 15 percent) and analysis and learning are the largest parts.
  4. Where the student gave no material for a stage, write a bracketed prompt in place of content, for example "[Add: how you felt when the family raised their voices, and why]". Do not invent feelings, events, outcomes or learning.
  5. In the analysis stage, show where theory or guidance belongs with bracketed reference prompts naming the kind of source, for example "[Add a reference: your professional code on communication, or a source on de-escalation]". Do not fabricate citations.
  6. Make the action plan specific: what the student will do differently, when, and how they will know it worked, drawn from their own learning points.
  7. Report the word count, and list what the student must add, what came from their words and what you rephrased.
constraints
  • Never invent experiences, feelings, conversations or learning points, and never fabricate references.
  • Keep confidentiality: no real names or identifying details of people or settings, even if the student included them.
  • Keep the student's voice: plain, first person, reflective. No grand claims they did not make.
  • Remind the student once that they are responsible for following their institution's rules on AI assistance and for checking every sentence is true to their experience.
  • If the experience is too short to reflect on (one line with no events or feelings), ask the specific questions for each stage of the model and stop.
output format

Reflective account

Under the model's stage headings, with bracketed prompts where content is missing. End with "Word count: N (limit )".

What you need to add

Numbered, by stage.

Your words and mine

Two short lists: phrases kept from the student, and places where you rephrased or restructured.

Before you submit

A checklist: anonymised, every bracket filled, references added in the course's style, word limit met, institution's AI-use rules followed.

1 required value still a placeholder; the assistant will ask for it.

details

kind
Prompt: a task you run by name to get one finished thing back
domain
Learning and education
category
Studying
level
Beginner
made for
Student
risk
read-only
version
v1.0.0 · incubating
reviewed
2026-10-03
works in
Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Antigravity, OpenCode, Windsurf, Zed, Continue, AGENTS.md, ChatGPT, claude.ai

Edit on GitHubReport a problem

use in

Hodios CLI
npx @hermes-hq/hodios install write-reflective-account --target claude-code
Agent Skills
npx skills add hermes-hq/hodios-dist --skill write-reflective-account -a claude-code
Add the Hodios marketplace (once)
claude plugin marketplace add hermes-hq/hodios-dist
Install the education plugin
claude plugin install hodios-education@hodios

The plugin brings every entry in this domain at once.

pairs well with

All of Studying
PromptStudying

Understand an assignment brief

Decodes an assignment brief and rubric into what is actually being asked, the hidden expectations, a dated step plan and a pre-submission checklist. Use when starting coursework.

understand-assignment-brief
PersonaTutoring

Writing tutor

Acts as a writing tutor who helps students build their own argument and voice, questions thesis and evidence, and teaches revision without writing the assignment. For school and university writers.

writing-tutor
RuleTutoring

Academic integrity rules

Standing rules that keep an assistant within academic integrity. It explains, hints and gives feedback but does not complete graded work or write submissions, and says so kindly.

academic-integrity-rules
PromptStudying

Turn marked feedback into targets

Translates tutor comments on marked essays or coursework into a few concrete targets, shows what each looks like done well, and builds a checklist for the next assignment.

act-on-marked-feedback
PromptStudying

Adapt study for a learning difference

Adapts study techniques for a learner with ADHD, dyslexia or dyspraxia, with environment changes, tools, chunking, a two-week experiment and how to request support.

adapt-study-for-learning-difference
PromptStudying

Analyse exam mistakes

Classifies the mistakes in marked work as knowledge gaps, misreads, slips, time pressure or method errors and builds a targeted review plan for each type. Use after getting work back.

analyze-exam-mistakes